Matt Jones just said….
- Thread starter gtown965
- Start date
I have the Inside Information on all of this.. Just wait and see.. I guarantee I'm right unless the kid changes his mind
Kid will be a 16/7 guys next year and he is trash SMH
Rancik brings some things Freeman doesn’t.
He’s a better jump shooter and passer. He even shot over 85% from the line on well over 100 attempts.
Freeman is better around and in the paint and is an elite defensive rebounder.
He’s a better jump shooter and passer. He even shot over 85% from the line on well over 100 attempts.
Freeman is better around and in the paint and is an elite defensive rebounder.
Unpopular opinion but I actually prefer Rancik and McBride, but I believe we end up with Freeman and Rancik which most will rejoice over and I’d still love. I’m fine with either and also with Freeman and McBride. Just need any combo of the 2. They are all major upgrades from Jelavic and MoD from last year.
I’m under the impression Freeman has been a done deal since yesterday and all the SJ and Tennessee smoke was only smoke. We will find out in the next 24 hours.
this
Get back to ball
Edit: Sorry coming back to this post. I know how you are. If I don’t say “stay attached” which is the most common terminology, you’ll say I’m an idiot so I’ll provide the clarity.
Last edited:
If we get Rancik and Freeman I’ll drive to Lexington and give Pope a kiss. He’s building a solid roster so far this offseason. These two and a backup guard? Dare I say even Stokes? Holy ****!
About as good as Calipari with double speak or coach speak. A lot of words that mean less than no words.
Just that people were mainly talking about Ranick . I haven’t seen one second of either one of them. I’ve stopped watching highlights of any player until they commit to us .
Plus , I saw someone else comparing Ranick to Carr .
Rancik is closer to a traditional stretch four. Freeman is more of a dynamic/hybrid four. More athletic and better driver than Carr. I wouldn’t say Carr is comparable to either but closer to Donnie Freeman. Either one is probably better than Carr in a vacuum imho.
Saying Rancik is trash automatically puts you on ignore as "the latest village idiot" who knows ZERO about the game of basketball...
What the hell did I do? lol.
absolutely agree with you on Rancik. He’d be an outstanding pick up for us.
Well, it WAS his 880th in 21 years. It was bound to be a doozy
You are basketball braindead my man. Just go talk to the other third graders in your neighborhood
You made 6500 messages with 113 points . You’re in the top 5 biggest losers posting here . What a failure
We will sign probably 5 more players, that’s not the roster just the current pieces.
113 is the max points.
Rancick’s perimeter game is slightly favorable to Carr’s just going by bulk stats. But otherwise what he’s turned in so far has been not nearly as good as Carr. He could certainly hit an upswing. I don’t think most people realize what we really had in Carr, especially if he’d stayed healthy.
Yeah , I was higher on Carr than most were .
It can be different depending on which site you originally made your username on. The point being the points system isn’t a grade of posting quality. Easy way to know that is post to like ratio.
Umm …Rancik shoot only 40% from the FLOOR …as in overall, even taking into account layups and dunks …NOT 40% “from 3.”
Now, please, continue with your Kevin Durant comparison.
The ONE. THING. that takes this team over the top is Stokes. Period. We don't get him, we're looking at double digit losses.