Where things stand with Iowa, Alvaro Folgueiras

uihawk82

All-Conference
Nov 17, 2021
2,268
3,372
113
would stirtz have been better off if he had taken more dollars instead of playing for bmac? i don’t believe so. a mature mind will think big picture and long term, but most of these guys are immature
Stirtz knew he had his coaches confidence after 3 years of playing, he knew the offense and what the coach wanted, he made some money but became near legend
 

eyesofhawk

All-Conference
Apr 17, 2011
1,897
2,152
113
If he can get more I can"t disagree that he can and should take it. I also understand Iowa being apprehensive about paying him above what they think his value is. His level varies widely from game to game. It's no different than letting an NBA free agent walk for money you don't want to match.

I'll always appreciate his time here and because of what he did vs Clemson/Florida/Nebraska I would agree with you the money probably was well spent. That doesn't mean If we pay him the same or more for next year he duplicates what he did in the tournament. If Florida doesn't play that ridiculous press we're probably saying we paid him too much.
Ridiculous press?

Florida played the defense every team would have played there.

Iowa just drew up something to beat it
 

Hawkfan_08*

All-American
Jul 2, 2025
2,920
7,611
113
Ridiculous press?

Florida played the defense every team would have played there.

Iowa just drew up something to beat it

I would have to disagree. I think most pundits do too.

You can have a guy up there about 3/4 court to make sure you get the clock moving but to go full court like that and give up a wide open look was a terrible defensive strategy. The initial defender was between the inbounder and Stirtz due to the aggressive nature of that press. Automatically gives the offense a numbers up advantage.
 

eyesofhawk

All-Conference
Apr 17, 2011
1,897
2,152
113
I would have to disagree. I think most pundits do too.

You can have a guy up there about 3/4 court to make sure you get the clock moving but to go full court like that and give up a wide open look was a terrible defensive strategy. The initial defender was between the inbounder and Stirtz due to the aggressive nature of that press. Automatically gives the offense a numbers up advantage.
 

EIHCGuy

Senior
Jul 7, 2025
202
413
63
Ridiculous press?

Florida played the defense every team would have played there.

Iowa just drew up something to beat it
I 100% disagree.

You do NOT chase the ball handler. You let the entry happen, then attack. You make sure NOTHING gets behind you if you're the back end. You also force Iowa to YOUR attack, thereby forcing longer passes ------ and the clock to wind out.
 

Slim45

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2019
621
1,974
93
Ridiculous press?

Florida played the defense every team would have played there.

Iowa just drew up something to beat it
Beavis And Butthead Comedy GIF by Paramount+
 

HawkinAnk74

Junior
Jun 11, 2025
154
228
43
How many people do you suppose have changed jobs for $10,000-$15,000, or even less? Maybe they were making $80k and could make $95k?

Well, maybe BMac is offering him $250,000 and he thinks he might get $750,000 to $1,000,000 in the right situation. Or, maybe $500,000. Who wouldn't enter the portal for a shot at $250,000 more money?

But, we don't know the numbers, so I can only hope that the participants to the discussion are handling it like adults.
Most of these guys aren't even 23 yet. They don't have the capacity to act like adults.
 

eyesofhawk

All-Conference
Apr 17, 2011
1,897
2,152
113
I 100% disagree.

You do NOT chase the ball handler. You let the entry happen, then attack. You make sure NOTHING gets behind you if you're the back end. You also force Iowa to YOUR attack, thereby forcing longer passes ------ and the clock to wind out.

Do you guys watch basketball? It's completely STANDARD for teams to not allow the inbound pass to be caught with forward momentum/force the inbound pass to be caught deep in the backcourt.

The link above explains how Iowa took advantage of that
 

HawkInDenver

Senior
Apr 16, 2024
467
904
93
Regarding Folgueiras, we haven't heard anythig definitive about staying or not -seems like a decision has to be made soon. That said, BM is looking at other forwards in the portal -perhaps BM thinks the Spaniard is on his way out so is actively working to replace him??

Pure speculation on my part....
 

HAWKNESS

Junior
Jul 6, 2025
190
338
63

Do you guys watch basketball? It's completely STANDARD for teams to not allow the inbound pass to be caught with forward momentum/force the inbound pass to be caught deep in the backcourt.

The link above explains how Iowa took advantage of that
Yes I'd agree, you don't want forward momentum but thats exactly what happened because defense allowed for that to happen. There was a lot of things wrong with the defense but 2 biggest ones is you don't put a man on the inbounder in that situation and you don't recklessly chase Stirtz like that allowing a fastbresk to happen. Florida played that possession as if it was behind. Golden later said they wanted to foul. That imo is also dumb decision but it does explain the defense a bit. Iowa really outplayed them anyways and still had to make the shot.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: eyesofhawk

Hawk_4shur

All-Conference
Jan 2, 2009
760
1,830
93

Do you guys watch basketball? It's completely STANDARD for teams to not allow the inbound pass to be caught with forward momentum/force the inbound pass to be caught deep in the backcourt.

The link above explains how Iowa took advantage of that
I think the first problem for Florida was that there was 8 seconds left - lots of time. So, it was going to be difficult for them to prevent Iowa from getting some kind of shot.

But the mistake IMO was that Florida had 3 guys pressing in the back court. The Hawks break that and it's a 3 on 2 fast break. And it was actually pretty easy.

If it were me, I wouldn't have had a defender on the ball and I would put two guys doing more of a soft press trying to keep the Iowa guys in front of them, but keep it so you've got 5 defenders when the ball gets to the front court.
 

IowaLaw

Senior
Nov 28, 2023
96
496
53
The women's team has had their share of 'involved' parents - see Deal and Guyton, etc...
If you want to talk "involved parents," didn't Caitlin Clark's entire family take 2+ years off from work to attend every one of her home and away games? Parents are typically looking out for their kids' best interests.
 

BigOHawk1

Senior
Oct 27, 2001
438
799
93
If you want to talk "involved parents," didn't Caitlin Clark's entire family take 2+ years off from work to attend every one of her home and away games? Parents are typically looking out for their kids' best interests.
True, I was thinking more along the lines of those parents nagging the staff about playing time and on the floor type things.
 

eyesofhawk

All-Conference
Apr 17, 2011
1,897
2,152
113
Yes I'd agree, you don't want forward momentum but thats exactly what happened because defense allowed for that to happen. There was a lot of things wrong with the defense but 2 biggest ones is you don't put a man on the inbounder in that situation and you don't recklessly chase Stirtz like that allowing a fastbresk to happen. Florida played that possession as if it was behind. Golden later said they wanted to foul. That imo is also dumb decision but it does explain the defense a bit. Iowa really outplayed them anyways and still had to make the shot.
Did you read the link?

No way they would try to foul. Golden was deflecting
 

eyesofhawk

All-Conference
Apr 17, 2011
1,897
2,152
113
I think the first problem for Florida was that there was 8 seconds left - lots of time. So, it was going to be difficult for them to prevent Iowa from getting some kind of shot.

But the mistake IMO was that Florida had 3 guys pressing in the back court. The Hawks break that and it's a 3 on 2 fast break. And it was actually pretty easy.

If it were me, I wouldn't have had a defender on the ball and I would put two guys doing more of a soft press trying to keep the Iowa guys in front of them, but keep it so you've got 5 defenders when the ball gets to the front court.
The link provided in posts #45 and #51 provide your answers.

Almost certainly, it wasn't an all-out press. The ball would have been "allowed" to be inbounded deep in the backcourt. Fland even immediately gave up the face guard, perhaps by rule.

The inbounds pass was guarded to force a high pass to the inbounder's right, which would have been obstructed by the basket.

Koch running the baseline, to be able to pass to his right, is what made the play.

Credit to Iowa. Florida was trying to not allow the inbound to be caught with forward momentum/force a deep catch. Completely STANDARD practice in that situation these days
 
Last edited:

SB_SB

All-Conference
Dec 17, 2022
1,463
2,645
113
So you haven't read the link. Gotcha

You're trying to defend something that was a complete failure. Just like in football, there are times when the DB plays on the line of scrimmage and there are times when he's backed a few yards so he can contain the WR. As a defender you want the WR catch the ball in front of you so you can make a play.

This is really about containment and Florida lost containment. You can say Ben's play was great, but at the same time, it's ok to say the defense did a terrible job.
 

Hawkangler

All-Conference
Mar 16, 2014
1,522
3,413
113
Regarding Folgueiras, we haven't heard anythig definitive about staying or not -seems like a decision has to be made soon. That said, BM is looking at other forwards in the portal -perhaps BM thinks the Spaniard is on his way out so is actively working to replace him??

Pure speculation on my part....
What about Thompson and Harris at the 4

Koch and Coon at the three

Sage and Howard at the two

Combs at pg or two depending on portal pg

Portal center, Manyawu, Jirak
 

Slim45

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2019
621
1,974
93
The link provided in posts #45 and #51 provide your answers.

Almost certainly, it wasn't an all-out press. The ball would have been "allowed" to be inbounded deep in the backcourt. Bland even immediately gave up the face guard, perhaps by rule.

The inbounds pass was guarded to force a high pass to the inbounder's right, which would have been obstructed by the basket.

Koch running the baseline, to be able to pass to his right, is what made the play.

Credit to Iowa. Florida was trying to not allow the inbound to be caught with forward momentum/force a deep catch. Completely STANDARD practice in that situation these days
So why the need for Golden to deflect saying they were trying to foul? Ohhh ya, because it was a terrible defensive set. But im sure you know far more about the game than the former players/coaches that all chimed in that night and for the next 5 days saying that was a trrrible way to defend in that situation. But carry on oh wise one, keep instilling more wisdom in us
 

eyesofhawk

All-Conference
Apr 17, 2011
1,897
2,152
113
You're trying to defend something that was a complete failure. Just like in football, there are times when the DB plays on the line of scrimmage and there are times when he's backed a few yards so he can contain the WR. As a defender you want the WR catch the ball in front of you so you can make a play.

This is really about containment and Florida lost containment. You can say Ben's play was great, but at the same time, it's ok to say the defense did a terrible job.

So why the need for Golden to deflect saying they were trying to foul? Ohhh ya, because it was a terrible defensive set. But im sure you know far more about the game than the former players/coaches that all chimed in that night and for the next 5 days saying that was a trrrible way to defend in that situation. But carry on oh wise one, keep instilling more wisdom in us
Simply watch the play, guys. It speaks for itself.

Unless perhaps, you are unable to wrap your head around the fact that, not allowing an uncontested inbounds catch is widely used strategy these days. The defense contests until the catch has to be made moving towards the inbounder and/or deep in the backcourt. Watch basketball games
 

eyesofhawk

All-Conference
Apr 17, 2011
1,897
2,152
113
You're trying to defend something that was a complete failure. Just like in football, there are times when the DB plays on the line of scrimmage and there are times when he's backed a few yards so he can contain the WR. As a defender you want the WR catch the ball in front of you so you can make a play.

This is really about containment and Florida lost containment. You can say Ben's play was great, but at the same time, it's ok to say the defense did a terrible job.
I've never tried to defend anything in football that was a complete failure. Read better.

No Florida's defense wasn't a failure. They used a widely employed strategy that they felt gave them the best chance in that situation.

Iowa beat the D with a special play. It happens. Credit to Iowa
 

eyesofhawk

All-Conference
Apr 17, 2011
1,897
2,152
113
So why the need for Golden to deflect saying they were trying to foul? Ohhh ya, because it was a terrible defensive set. But im sure you know far more about the game than the former players/coaches that all chimed in that night and for the next 5 days saying that was a trrrible way to defend in that situation. But carry on oh wise one, keep instilling more wisdom in us
Who cares why Golden said what he said? It's irrelevant to the play.

My best guess is he was being a poor loser in that moment
 
Jun 28, 2025
446
959
93
I'm sure it's a bit more tricky than I tried to explain it and I did see they haven't finalized how to deal with the new revenue sharing stuff, which they also shouldn't qualify for "on paper" because it's basically working for the school to be compensated. But there has to be some workarounds for these things or we wouldn't even by worried about how much Alvaro was making or will make this year.
NIL and the revenue sharing piece are separate entities in regards to international student athletes.
 

BigOHawk1

Senior
Oct 27, 2001
438
799
93
What about Thompson and Harris at the 4

Koch and Coon at the three

Sage and Howard at the two

Combs at pg or two depending on portal pg

Portal center, Manyawu, Jirak
This, good lineup and 100% Coon can play the 3 or even the 2. Harris and Trey will be problems for the B10 sooner than later and if Howard bumps up a bit I'm comfortable there too.

Kael is a good off guard with some PG play too and we will get help there most definitely. There are just too many good players with and without huge asking prices in the portal -- wasn't it something like 49% of scholly D1 kids are in the portal...nuts...
 

52317Hawk

All-Conference
Jul 3, 2025
964
1,132
93
Who cares why Golden said what he said? It's irrelevant to the play.

My best guess is he was being a poor loser in that moment
Read better....
But im sure you know far more about the game than the former players/coaches that all chimed in that night and for the next 5 days saying that was a trrrible way to defend in that situation.
 

oldxbbc

All-American
Sep 19, 2013
1,668
7,025
113
This, good lineup and 100% Coon can play the 3 or even the 2. Harris and Trey will be problems for the B10 sooner than later and if Howard bumps up a bit I'm comfortable there too.

Kael is a good off guard with some PG play too and we will get help there most definitely. There are just too many good players with and without huge asking prices in the portal -- wasn't it something like 49% of scholly D1 kids are in the portal...nuts...
Still think we need a rim protector at the 5.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOHawk1

HMB Trumpet

Senior
Mar 19, 2018
398
481
63
I would have to disagree. I think most pundits do too.

You can have a guy up there about 3/4 court to make sure you get the clock moving but to go full court like that and give up a wide open look was a terrible defensive strategy. The initial defender was between the inbounder and Stirtz due to the aggressive nature of that press. Automatically gives the offense a numbers up advantage.
Not quite the same numbers advantage as Nebraska gave :), but that's spot on. And the Hawks took advantage of it.
 

SB_SB

All-Conference
Dec 17, 2022
1,463
2,645
113
Simply watch the play, guys. It speaks for itself.

Unless perhaps, you are unable to wrap your head around the fact that, not allowing an uncontested inbounds catch is widely used strategy these days. The defense contests until the catch has to be made moving towards the inbounder and/or deep in the backcourt. Watch basketball games

FYI, the catch was made moving away from the inbounder. So the defense didn't force the catch to be made moving towards the inbounder so what Florida did was opposite from what you're saying.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: eyesofhawk

SB_SB

All-Conference
Dec 17, 2022
1,463
2,645
113
I've never tried to defend anything in football that was a complete failure. Read better.

No Florida's defense wasn't a failure. They used a widely employed strategy that they felt gave them the best chance in that situation.

Iowa beat the D with a special play. It happens. Credit to Iowa

I never said you defended failure in football. You defending Florida is the failures. Take your own advice and read better.

How do you think Iowa came up with that special play, it was because they saw how Florida was guarding and used it against Florida.
 

Hawk_4shur

All-Conference
Jan 2, 2009
760
1,830
93
The link provided in posts #45 and #51 provide your answers.

Almost certainly, it wasn't an all-out press. The ball would have been "allowed" to be inbounded deep in the backcourt. Fland even immediately gave up the face guard, perhaps by rule.

The inbounds pass was guarded to force a high pass to the inbounder's right, which would have been obstructed by the basket.

Koch running the baseline, to be able to pass to his right, is what made the play.

Credit to Iowa. Florida was trying to not allow the inbound to be caught with forward momentum/force a deep catch. Completely STANDARD practice in that situation these days
Ok. You're probably right, but it's not how I would have played it.

Notice, Iowa did what I suggested Florida should have done on Florida's last attempt. No one on the inbounder, Three guys in the back court in a soft press, not letting them get behind them. When the ball gets to the front court it's 5 v 5.
 
Feb 25, 2008
30,590
28,519
113
Simply watch the play, guys. It speaks for itself.

Unless perhaps, you are unable to wrap your head around the fact that, not allowing an uncontested inbounds catch is widely used strategy these days. The defense contests until the catch has to be made moving towards the inbounder and/or deep in the backcourt. Watch basketball games
1. You first.

2. You don't know as much as you think you know/project about basketball.

3. You're trying too hard to be contrarian in a thread...............again.
 

Kceasthawk@77

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2005
2,156
3,939
113
Many of the parents aren't much better. Junior is still going to listen to Mommy & Daddy for the most part IMO.

Stirtz's parents seemed to be pretty grounded, not shockingly much like their Son. (and their Son transferred 3 times, all somewhat local for them to travel, all with the same Coach, all upgrades in competition - they got it and their Son will do well whatever the future holds for him because of them).
Stirtz dad was his coach at Liberty where he played. He understands the relationship of coach/star player
 

2432Hawk

Heisman
Jun 22, 2002
5,736
10,523
113
What about Thompson and Harris at the 4

Koch and Coon at the three

Sage and Howard at the two

Combs at pg or two depending on portal pg

Portal center, Manyawu, Jirak
Koch has work to do on guarding wing forwards. Right now Thompson and Harris would be penciled in there.

Thompson has been really impressive late this season in practice as he's picked up his abilities to defend 2 thru 5 and he's a bucket.
Shooting well from 3 and attacks closeouts and finishes at the rim with aggression.
 

HAWKNESS

Junior
Jul 6, 2025
190
338
63
Koch has work to do on guarding wing forwards. Right now Thompson and Harris would be penciled in there.

Thompson has been really impressive late this season in practice as he's picked up his abilities to defend 2 thru 5 and he's a bucket.
Shooting well from 3 and attacks closeouts and finishes at the rim with aggression.
That's music to my ears