Sounds like isu players took little less than they almost didn’t have enough to pay them
The most stressed hes been in his life is finding a way to get college kids cash for playing basketball?
Sounds like isu players took little less than they almost didn’t have enough to pay them
Stirtz knew he had his coaches confidence after 3 years of playing, he knew the offense and what the coach wanted, he made some money but became near legendwould stirtz have been better off if he had taken more dollars instead of playing for bmac? i don’t believe so. a mature mind will think big picture and long term, but most of these guys are immature
Ridiculous press?If he can get more I can"t disagree that he can and should take it. I also understand Iowa being apprehensive about paying him above what they think his value is. His level varies widely from game to game. It's no different than letting an NBA free agent walk for money you don't want to match.
I'll always appreciate his time here and because of what he did vs Clemson/Florida/Nebraska I would agree with you the money probably was well spent. That doesn't mean If we pay him the same or more for next year he duplicates what he did in the tournament. If Florida doesn't play that ridiculous press we're probably saying we paid him too much.
Ridiculous press?
Florida played the defense every team would have played there.
Iowa just drew up something to beat it
I would have to disagree. I think most pundits do too.
You can have a guy up there about 3/4 court to make sure you get the clock moving but to go full court like that and give up a wide open look was a terrible defensive strategy. The initial defender was between the inbounder and Stirtz due to the aggressive nature of that press. Automatically gives the offense a numbers up advantage.
Probably time for him to check his life’s priorities. This is supposed to be entertainment, not life or death.The most stressed hes been in his life is finding a way to get college kids cash for playing basketball?
I 100% disagree.Ridiculous press?
Florida played the defense every team would have played there.
Iowa just drew up something to beat it
In our church we called it "In God We Trust".Wow! This is called "faith based funding". The only reason I know this is I've been on a church council before (no, I have no desire to do that again).
Hopefully that works out for them!
Ridiculous press?
Florida played the defense every team would have played there.
Iowa just drew up something to beat it
Most of these guys aren't even 23 yet. They don't have the capacity to act like adults.How many people do you suppose have changed jobs for $10,000-$15,000, or even less? Maybe they were making $80k and could make $95k?
Well, maybe BMac is offering him $250,000 and he thinks he might get $750,000 to $1,000,000 in the right situation. Or, maybe $500,000. Who wouldn't enter the portal for a shot at $250,000 more money?
But, we don't know the numbers, so I can only hope that the participants to the discussion are handling it like adults.
I 100% disagree.
You do NOT chase the ball handler. You let the entry happen, then attack. You make sure NOTHING gets behind you if you're the back end. You also force Iowa to YOUR attack, thereby forcing longer passes ------ and the clock to wind out.
Yes I'd agree, you don't want forward momentum but thats exactly what happened because defense allowed for that to happen. There was a lot of things wrong with the defense but 2 biggest ones is you don't put a man on the inbounder in that situation and you don't recklessly chase Stirtz like that allowing a fastbresk to happen. Florida played that possession as if it was behind. Golden later said they wanted to foul. That imo is also dumb decision but it does explain the defense a bit. Iowa really outplayed them anyways and still had to make the shot.![]()
Why didnt Fl coach play his zone press against the hawks on their last possession.
You all saw that the hawks had to pass the ball around a few times to get it past half court. Fl could have been in a 2-1-2 zone trap press, let the hawks inbound the ball in the backcourt and trap and make us pass the ball a couple times or attempt a long pass after inbounding the ball. They...www.on3.com
Do you guys watch basketball? It's completely STANDARD for teams to not allow the inbound pass to be caught with forward momentum/force the inbound pass to be caught deep in the backcourt.
The link above explains how Iowa took advantage of that
I think the first problem for Florida was that there was 8 seconds left - lots of time. So, it was going to be difficult for them to prevent Iowa from getting some kind of shot.![]()
Why didnt Fl coach play his zone press against the hawks on their last possession.
You all saw that the hawks had to pass the ball around a few times to get it past half court. Fl could have been in a 2-1-2 zone trap press, let the hawks inbound the ball in the backcourt and trap and make us pass the ball a couple times or attempt a long pass after inbounding the ball. They...www.on3.com
Do you guys watch basketball? It's completely STANDARD for teams to not allow the inbound pass to be caught with forward momentum/force the inbound pass to be caught deep in the backcourt.
The link above explains how Iowa took advantage of that
If you want to talk "involved parents," didn't Caitlin Clark's entire family take 2+ years off from work to attend every one of her home and away games? Parents are typically looking out for their kids' best interests.The women's team has had their share of 'involved' parents - see Deal and Guyton, etc...
True, I was thinking more along the lines of those parents nagging the staff about playing time and on the floor type things.If you want to talk "involved parents," didn't Caitlin Clark's entire family take 2+ years off from work to attend every one of her home and away games? Parents are typically looking out for their kids' best interests.
Did you read the link?Yes I'd agree, you don't want forward momentum but thats exactly what happened because defense allowed for that to happen. There was a lot of things wrong with the defense but 2 biggest ones is you don't put a man on the inbounder in that situation and you don't recklessly chase Stirtz like that allowing a fastbresk to happen. Florida played that possession as if it was behind. Golden later said they wanted to foul. That imo is also dumb decision but it does explain the defense a bit. Iowa really outplayed them anyways and still had to make the shot.
And why would he be deflecting? Because his Defense in that situation was fuggin idiotic and everyone was calling him out for itDid you read the link?
No way they would try to foul. Golden was deflecting
So you haven't read the link. GotchaAnd why would he be deflecting? Because his Defense in that situation was fuggin idiotic and everyone was calling him out for it
The link provided in posts #45 and #51 provide your answers.I think the first problem for Florida was that there was 8 seconds left - lots of time. So, it was going to be difficult for them to prevent Iowa from getting some kind of shot.
But the mistake IMO was that Florida had 3 guys pressing in the back court. The Hawks break that and it's a 3 on 2 fast break. And it was actually pretty easy.
If it were me, I wouldn't have had a defender on the ball and I would put two guys doing more of a soft press trying to keep the Iowa guys in front of them, but keep it so you've got 5 defenders when the ball gets to the front court.
So you haven't read the link. Gotcha
What about Thompson and Harris at the 4Regarding Folgueiras, we haven't heard anythig definitive about staying or not -seems like a decision has to be made soon. That said, BM is looking at other forwards in the portal -perhaps BM thinks the Spaniard is on his way out so is actively working to replace him??
Pure speculation on my part....
So why the need for Golden to deflect saying they were trying to foul? Ohhh ya, because it was a terrible defensive set. But im sure you know far more about the game than the former players/coaches that all chimed in that night and for the next 5 days saying that was a trrrible way to defend in that situation. But carry on oh wise one, keep instilling more wisdom in usThe link provided in posts #45 and #51 provide your answers.
Almost certainly, it wasn't an all-out press. The ball would have been "allowed" to be inbounded deep in the backcourt. Bland even immediately gave up the face guard, perhaps by rule.
The inbounds pass was guarded to force a high pass to the inbounder's right, which would have been obstructed by the basket.
Koch running the baseline, to be able to pass to his right, is what made the play.
Credit to Iowa. Florida was trying to not allow the inbound to be caught with forward momentum/force a deep catch. Completely STANDARD practice in that situation these days
You're trying to defend something that was a complete failure. Just like in football, there are times when the DB plays on the line of scrimmage and there are times when he's backed a few yards so he can contain the WR. As a defender you want the WR catch the ball in front of you so you can make a play.
This is really about containment and Florida lost containment. You can say Ben's play was great, but at the same time, it's ok to say the defense did a terrible job.
Simply watch the play, guys. It speaks for itself.So why the need for Golden to deflect saying they were trying to foul? Ohhh ya, because it was a terrible defensive set. But im sure you know far more about the game than the former players/coaches that all chimed in that night and for the next 5 days saying that was a trrrible way to defend in that situation. But carry on oh wise one, keep instilling more wisdom in us
I've never tried to defend anything in football that was a complete failure. Read better.You're trying to defend something that was a complete failure. Just like in football, there are times when the DB plays on the line of scrimmage and there are times when he's backed a few yards so he can contain the WR. As a defender you want the WR catch the ball in front of you so you can make a play.
This is really about containment and Florida lost containment. You can say Ben's play was great, but at the same time, it's ok to say the defense did a terrible job.
Who cares why Golden said what he said? It's irrelevant to the play.So why the need for Golden to deflect saying they were trying to foul? Ohhh ya, because it was a terrible defensive set. But im sure you know far more about the game than the former players/coaches that all chimed in that night and for the next 5 days saying that was a trrrible way to defend in that situation. But carry on oh wise one, keep instilling more wisdom in us
NIL and the revenue sharing piece are separate entities in regards to international student athletes.I'm sure it's a bit more tricky than I tried to explain it and I did see they haven't finalized how to deal with the new revenue sharing stuff, which they also shouldn't qualify for "on paper" because it's basically working for the school to be compensated. But there has to be some workarounds for these things or we wouldn't even by worried about how much Alvaro was making or will make this year.
This, good lineup and 100% Coon can play the 3 or even the 2. Harris and Trey will be problems for the B10 sooner than later and if Howard bumps up a bit I'm comfortable there too.What about Thompson and Harris at the 4
Koch and Coon at the three
Sage and Howard at the two
Combs at pg or two depending on portal pg
Portal center, Manyawu, Jirak
Read better....Who cares why Golden said what he said? It's irrelevant to the play.
My best guess is he was being a poor loser in that moment
Still think we need a rim protector at the 5.This, good lineup and 100% Coon can play the 3 or even the 2. Harris and Trey will be problems for the B10 sooner than later and if Howard bumps up a bit I'm comfortable there too.
Kael is a good off guard with some PG play too and we will get help there most definitely. There are just too many good players with and without huge asking prices in the portal -- wasn't it something like 49% of scholly D1 kids are in the portal...nuts...
You linked to a post you made in a different thread. Citing yourself isn't some grand gotcha. Back to ignore.Did you read the link?
No way they would try to foul. Golden was deflecting
Not quite the same numbers advantage as Nebraska gaveI would have to disagree. I think most pundits do too.
You can have a guy up there about 3/4 court to make sure you get the clock moving but to go full court like that and give up a wide open look was a terrible defensive strategy. The initial defender was between the inbounder and Stirtz due to the aggressive nature of that press. Automatically gives the offense a numbers up advantage.
Simply watch the play, guys. It speaks for itself.
Unless perhaps, you are unable to wrap your head around the fact that, not allowing an uncontested inbounds catch is widely used strategy these days. The defense contests until the catch has to be made moving towards the inbounder and/or deep in the backcourt. Watch basketball games
I've never tried to defend anything in football that was a complete failure. Read better.
No Florida's defense wasn't a failure. They used a widely employed strategy that they felt gave them the best chance in that situation.
Iowa beat the D with a special play. It happens. Credit to Iowa
Ok. You're probably right, but it's not how I would have played it.The link provided in posts #45 and #51 provide your answers.
Almost certainly, it wasn't an all-out press. The ball would have been "allowed" to be inbounded deep in the backcourt. Fland even immediately gave up the face guard, perhaps by rule.
The inbounds pass was guarded to force a high pass to the inbounder's right, which would have been obstructed by the basket.
Koch running the baseline, to be able to pass to his right, is what made the play.
Credit to Iowa. Florida was trying to not allow the inbound to be caught with forward momentum/force a deep catch. Completely STANDARD practice in that situation these days
1. You first.Simply watch the play, guys. It speaks for itself.
Unless perhaps, you are unable to wrap your head around the fact that, not allowing an uncontested inbounds catch is widely used strategy these days. The defense contests until the catch has to be made moving towards the inbounder and/or deep in the backcourt. Watch basketball games
Stirtz dad was his coach at Liberty where he played. He understands the relationship of coach/star playerMany of the parents aren't much better. Junior is still going to listen to Mommy & Daddy for the most part IMO.
Stirtz's parents seemed to be pretty grounded, not shockingly much like their Son. (and their Son transferred 3 times, all somewhat local for them to travel, all with the same Coach, all upgrades in competition - they got it and their Son will do well whatever the future holds for him because of them).
Koch has work to do on guarding wing forwards. Right now Thompson and Harris would be penciled in there.What about Thompson and Harris at the 4
Koch and Coon at the three
Sage and Howard at the two
Combs at pg or two depending on portal pg
Portal center, Manyawu, Jirak
That's music to my earsKoch has work to do on guarding wing forwards. Right now Thompson and Harris would be penciled in there.
Thompson has been really impressive late this season in practice as he's picked up his abilities to defend 2 thru 5 and he's a bucket.
Shooting well from 3 and attacks closeouts and finishes at the rim with aggression.