Military Strikes on Iran Imminent

Allornothing

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
11,807
13,067
113

Someone with computer skills could make a lot of money making playing cards like they did for DS/DS.

They want "death to America". It's kind of hard to bring that about when you are already dead. **** them. I feel zero shame in that.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
47,382
36,439
113
Guess who opposes …


This piece of sh!!TT is so desperate to get his name out there. I’ve been trying to tell you guys. He’s nothing more than a political bomb thrower a lot like Gaetz, AOC, Omar

Totally agree. Massie should be primaried in KY and sent home.
 

baltimorened

All-American
May 29, 2001
7,318
5,459
113
Donald the Dove, indeed
destroying Iran's nuclear capabilities/ambitions won't mean much to the boomer generation, but for those that follow it has a lot of meaning. A nuclear capable Iran would/could eliminate the entire concept of mutual assured destruction that has guided military concepts for decades. There is significant doubt that Iranian leaders care a lot about being a first strike nation and thoughts, right or wrong, that Iran would use a first strike nuclear weapon are not crazy.

It is best to solve the problem when it's easiest to solve the problem. And, it's easiest to solve the problem before Iran has a first strike nuclear capability.
 

Aardvark86

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
2,071
3,125
113
I have to say, I hate modern war. A terrible paradox how “precision” may in the one hand reduce civilian casualties but simultaneously conceals the horror of it. Which just makes it that much easier to wage.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

Allornothing

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
11,807
13,067
113
Guess who opposes …


This piece of sh!!TT is so desperate to get his name out there. I’ve been trying to tell you guys. He’s nothing more than a political bomb thrower a lot like Gaetz, AOC, Omar

How could he (Massie) tell us he is a RINO without telling us he is a RINO any better?
 

Moogy

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2017
6,559
4,716
113
destroying Iran's nuclear capabilities/ambitions won't mean much to the boomer generation, but for those that follow it has a lot of meaning. A nuclear capable Iran would/could eliminate the entire concept of mutual assured destruction that has guided military concepts for decades. There is significant doubt that Iranian leaders care a lot about being a first strike nation and thoughts, right or wrong, that Iran would use a first strike nuclear weapon are not crazy.

It is best to solve the problem when it's easiest to solve the problem. And, it's easiest to solve the problem before Iran has a first strike nuclear capability.

But we already destroyed Iran's nuclear capabilities just a little while ago ... and set them back years and years.

Maybe we need to attack Iran's time travel capabilities, instead? That seems to be the real bugaboo here, no?
 

PawPride

Heisman
Nov 28, 2004
53,151
10,460
113
destroying Iran's nuclear capabilities/ambitions won't mean much to the boomer generation, but for those that follow it has a lot of meaning. A nuclear capable Iran would/could eliminate the entire concept of mutual assured destruction that has guided military concepts for decades. There is significant doubt that Iranian leaders care a lot about being a first strike nation and thoughts, right or wrong, that Iran would use a first strike nuclear weapon are not crazy.

It is best to solve the problem when it's easiest to solve the problem. And, it's easiest to solve the problem before Iran has a first strike nuclear capability.
Yeah color me skeptical this is “solving the problem.” I’m just tired of Republican administrations starting **** in the Middle East. I did not vote for this ****
 

Aardvark86

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
2,071
3,125
113
Yeah color me skeptical this is “solving the problem.” I’m just tired of Republican administrations starting **** in the Middle East. I did not vote for this ****
Personal, my gut instinct is that this has nothing to do with nuclear stuff, or Israel, or geopolitics. It’s payback for 1979, pure and simple, in the presidents mind. Actually kinda surprised nobody seems to go there.
 

anon1772460595

All-Conference
Aug 31, 2025
688
1,126
82
Yeah color me skeptical this is “solving the problem.” I’m just tired of Republican administrations starting **** in the Middle East. I did not vote for this
Good thing Israel approved our war and not Congress.

make it make sense.
 

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
10,282
21,834
113
Being passive is permitting.
There are horrific murders every single day. So it seems like choosing a random, horrible murder and using it to then justify whatever you want. The person was caught, will be tried, etc. It wasn’t the state doing it. No one is arguing they shouldn’t be charged or that she deserved it, etc. It will be punished to the full extent of the law. There is nothing to protest.
 

baltimorened

All-American
May 29, 2001
7,318
5,459
113
There are horrific murders every single day. So it seems like choosing a random, horrible murder and using it to then justify whatever you want. The person was caught, will be tried, etc. It wasn’t the state doing it. No one is arguing they shouldn’t be charged or that she deserved it, etc. It will be punished to the full extent of the law. There is nothing to protest.
agree with you. it would be nice if the random horrible murder was a one off, but that's not the case.
 

JohnHughsPartner

All-American
Nov 19, 2016
6,213
8,511
113
There are horrific murders every single day. So it seems like choosing a random, horrible murder and using it to then justify whatever you want. The person was caught, will be tried, etc. It wasn’t the state doing it. No one is arguing they shouldn’t be charged or that she deserved it, etc. It will be punished to the full extent of the law. There is nothing to protest.
Correct, but do you understand how this murder happened and why it got national attention?