Mark Pope glazes JMI and Mitch

FLBBNFAN

All-Conference
Mar 25, 2025
804
1,535
93
No matter how you slice it, ultimately the blame falls on Pope. I’m just asking somebody to be honest about something for once. The constant regurgitation of this untalented roster nonsense needs put to the test. I have many examples of talented teams that stunk in Uk history and they’ve been coached by various types of coaches. The truth is injuries, chemistry and morale matter. It can cause a talented team to look like a very untalented one. I just want to hear someone be consistent about something.
I agree, most people thought our roster was a top ten roster. For those who honestly said otherwise pre season I tip my cap to them for recognizing a problem that so many missed (myself included).
 

RunninRichie

Heisman
Sep 5, 2019
28,961
69,716
113
I didn’t ask what the team’s flaws were. Every team has flaws. By the way the 1966 Rupp’s runts played a tight rotation as well. I’m asking you to be consistent here. Go ahead and say the 1967 and 1976 teams were untalented. I dare ya
Spin. Talent matters. Coaching matters. Coaching can elevate not so talented teams (Purdue). But talent can also elevate coaching. What we have here, is piss poor coaching. Mixed with subpar talent. Nowhere did I say team chemistry didn't matter or injuries. If the talent was as good as the media and Pom said. We wouldn't be 0-4 in Q1 games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wildcatjedi

anon1777473514

Heisman
Jul 30, 2024
6,486
12,981
113
I agree, most people thought our roster was a top ten roster. For those who honestly said otherwise pre season I tip my cap to them for recognizing a problem that so many missed (myself included).
I don’t think talent is the problem at all, but at least those people are consistent.
 

anon1777473514

Heisman
Jul 30, 2024
6,486
12,981
113
Spin. Talent matters. Coaching matters. Coaching can eleveate not so talented teams (Purdue). But talent can also eleveate coaching. What we have here, is piss poor coaching. Mixed with subpar talent. Nowhere did I say team chemistry didn't matter or injuries. If the talent was as good as the media and Pom said. We wouldn't be 0-4 in Q1 games.
You can always tell when you’re dealing with dishonesty if someone can’t answer a basic question. Is the 1967 team untalented? Also, is the 1976 team untalented?
 

Kentucky15

All-Conference
Mar 29, 2013
2,033
4,224
108
Mark really shouldn’t have said what he said. Anyone who can see what’s going on here needs to turn it in with him. I gave him more than a fair shot. He’s coming in and he’s a yes man, he wants to cover for failure. They’re all making money and people in charge care nothing about winning. Now Kentucky, you either clear these men out of here or you lose your program. This isn’t a hard call, these guys are not winners, they’re collectors. This is about keeping as much money in house for themselves and the library buildings as possible and getting the fanbase to accept average so they don’t pay out. They do not want to win.

Pope just solidified why he’s here. Mitch finally got control over the basketball program. This is what he does with control.
 

20MRoster

All-Conference
Nov 16, 2018
1,327
2,636
108
I don’t think Ken Pomeroy’s computer had blue glasses. You never did answer my question: Was the 1967 team untalented?

Louie Dampier
Pat Riley
Thad Jaracz
I have no idea how Riley was as a player but he's obviously a HOF basketball mind. Would be an interesting data project to see the impact that having a future successful coach has on the success of a team. I haven't seen any study like this? Make it happen, Village!
 
  • Like
Reactions: RunninRichie

RunninRichie

Heisman
Sep 5, 2019
28,961
69,716
113
Mark really shouldn’t have said what he said. Anyone who can see what’s going on here needs to turn it in with him. I gave him more than a fair shot. He’s coming in and he’s a yes man, he wants to cover for failure. They’re all making money and people in charge care nothing about winning. Now Kentucky, you either clear these men out of here or you lose your program. This isn’t a hard call, these guys are not winners, they’re collectors. This is about keeping as much money in house for themselves and the library buildings as possible and getting the fanbase to accept average so they don’t pay out. They do not want to win.

Pope just solidified why he’s here. Mitch finally got control over the basketball program. This is what he does with control.
I know people said it's his boss. But if Pope loves UK as much as he says. And is a Pitino guy. Why not call a spade a spade? Ride for this program. Barnhart won't like it, but who GAF? Everyone knows the problem here. And Pope is siding with the corrupt administration rather than the program and university he claims to love.
 

anon1777473514

Heisman
Jul 30, 2024
6,486
12,981
113
Your surrender is noted.
Call it surrender if you want. You could t answer the question and I don’t blame you. It wasn’t in your best interest to stand by the fire. Don’t worry, 99% of the website agrees with you and you’ll be get away with nonsense because it reinforces their presuppositions. No team looks talented while playing awful basketball, it doesn’t undermine the truth. I didn’t bring up the 2021 team, very talented—- awful roster fit. Multiple guys playing in the league and went 9-16. I just wish people tried to dig deeper rather than always being lazy and calling everything a talent issue. Pope is responsible for this clunker — in my mind, even more so. Because he was handed a lot.
 

anon1777473514

Heisman
Jul 30, 2024
6,486
12,981
113
I have no idea how Riley was as a player but he's obviously a HOF basketball mind. Would be an interesting data project to see the impact that having a future successful coach has on the success of a team. I haven't seen any study like this? Make it happen, Village!
Maybe someday for sure. That’s an interesting idea.
 

RunninRichie

Heisman
Sep 5, 2019
28,961
69,716
113
Call it surrender if you want. You could t answer the question and I don’t blame you. It wasn’t in your best interest to stand by the fire. Don’t worry, 99% of the website agrees with you and you’ll be get away with nonsense because it reinforces their presuppositions. No team looks talented while playing awful basketball, it doesn’t undermine the truth. I didn’t bring up the 2021 team, very talented—- awful roster fit. Multiple guys playing in the league and went 9-16. I just wish people tried to dig deeper rather than always being lazy and calling everything a talent issue. Pope is responsible for this clunker — in my mind, even more so. Because he was handed a lot.
Because I answered your question. You're trying to paint me into a corner here. "Duh he thinks talent only matters". When I didn't say that once. We have a mix of bad coaching and subpar talent. There's a reason Mo D and Zel didn't start. JQ is the legit only elite talent we have on this squad. We have role players starting. The rest of the team is so-so.

Just ask yourself, what player would start on any of UK's title winning teams past 1960? For me that's JQ. Nobody else.
 

JAC71

All-American
Jun 28, 2015
5,027
9,463
113
It doesn’t help that Pope can’t handle different personalities on the team. These guys want to be the star which is something they are not
 

anon1777473514

Heisman
Jul 30, 2024
6,486
12,981
113
Because I answered your question. You're trying to paint me into a corner here. "Duh he thinks talent only matters". When I didn't say that once. We have a mix of bad coaching and subpar talent. There's a reason Mo D and Zel didn't start. JQ is the legit only elite talent we have on this squad. We have role players starting. The rest of the team is so-so.

Just ask yourself, what player would start on any of UK's title winning teams past 1960? For me that's JQ. Nobody else.
You didn’t my question so I won’t answer yours. Yes, it was clear I was painting you into a corner. That was not a stealth mission. I’ll leave it there.
 

FLBBNFAN

All-Conference
Mar 25, 2025
804
1,535
93
Read my above post. Nobody really got it wrong, the team is poorly coached and they regressed. They didn’t take the sophomore or junior leap. It is what it is.
I agree. It hasn't translated into wins and excellence on the court which is all that counts.
 

RunninRichie

Heisman
Sep 5, 2019
28,961
69,716
113
You didn’t my question so I won’t answer yours. Yes, it was clear I was painting you into a corner. That was not a stealth mission. I’ll leave it there.
If it makes you feel better, I drank the kool-aid in the off-season. I figured with Pope's offense and going to the sweet 16 with portal scraps. We were destined to be a top 5 team. I figured the offense would elevate these guys. Mo D would be an enforcer for us. Defense would be improved. Kam Williams would be shooting it from deep like Brea. Oweh would come back and put up 12-15 a night, etc etc. Heres a quote from me in April. But reality has sat in. And I see the talent (and the coaching) isn't as good as I thought it would be on paper. Roster doesn't have enough shooting for Pope's offense. And it doesn't even look like he's even running the same O as last year. Probably because he's being recruited against (who wants to play 22mpg), etc etc. Im making my own observations too.
Dude we have a top 3 roster for next year. Mostly all done without major reliance, on high school, recuriting rankings. And you're crying because we paid 2 million, for Todd Golden's probable lead guard for next year. And a guy who just won a NCAA title.
 

anon1777473514

Heisman
Jul 30, 2024
6,486
12,981
113
If it makes you feel better, I drank the kool-aid in the off-season. I figured with Pope's offense and going to the sweet 16 with portal scraps. We were destined to be a top 5 team. I figured the offense would elevate these guys. Mo D would be an enforcer for us. Defense would be improved. Kam Williams would be shooting it from deep like Brea. Oweh would come back and put up 12-15 a night, etc etc. Heres a quote from me in April. But reality has sat in. And I see the talent (and the coaching) isn't as good as I thought it would be on paper. Roster doesn't have enough shooting for Pope's offense. And it doesn't even look like he's even running the same O as last year. Probably because he's being recruited against (who wants to play 22mpg), etc etc. Im making my own observations too.
So you came to same conclusion I did that this was a really good roster talent-wise. There was plenty of film for everyone we added from the portal except for Kam. There were only a few full games I could find of him. Did you review these guys and come to your own conclusions or did you just read websites and accept someone else’s analysis?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AllBall

RunninRichie

Heisman
Sep 5, 2019
28,961
69,716
113
So you came to same conclusion I did that this was a really good roster talent-wise. There was plenty of film for everyone we added from the portal except for Kam. There were only a few full games I could find of him. Did you review these guys and come to your own conclusions or did you just read websites and accept someone else’s analysis?
Lot's of assumptions by me. I assumed Kam would shoot close to 38% from 3. Oweh would play the same as he did last season. Mo D would bring a toughness and culture of defnese to the team. I wasn't thrilled with BG returning. But, like I said, I was high on the sweet 16/Pope's offense. And believed it would all work out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AllBall

Goingfor9

All-Conference
Jan 27, 2003
16,291
3,166
113
Interesting twist to the cycle:
  1. Pope bungles recruiting and loses games in a catastrophic start to the season.
  2. His camp blames JMI due to heat
  3. Inconvenient info about JMI and Barnhart comes out
  4. Pope loves JMI and Barnhart

What will the update be if they lose to IU tomorrow night?

I don't think I've been this down in the dumps since probation.
This is the narrative for every regime before it falls. The entire fiasco is escalating and a loss to IU will be gasoline
 

RunninRichie

Heisman
Sep 5, 2019
28,961
69,716
113
This is the narrative for every regime before it falls. The entire fiasco is escalating and a loss to IU will be gasoline
An IU loss is the end for the Pope era. The fanbase support will be gone. At that point he's a lame duck. Recruits and their families/agents/etc will know it too. Pretty wild how fast the wheels fell off.
 

anon1777473514

Heisman
Jul 30, 2024
6,486
12,981
113
Lot's of assumptions by me. I assumed Kam would shoot close to 38% from 3. Oweh would play the same as he did last season. Mo D would bring a toughness and culture of defnese to the team. I wasn't thrilled with BG returning. But, like I said, I was high on the sweet 16/Pope's offense. And believed it would all work out.
I’m reading that to mean you relied on others for analysis. Here’s what I’ll say. Two things can be correct simultaneously:

1.) it is correct that Pope did NOT get what many of us believe were his first choices. We can argue about why or why not, but this should be a point of agreement to any reasonable person.

2.) there is plenty of talent on this team. Most coaches would trade this roster for theirs in a heartbeat, assuming health.

We have to be able to recognize that sometimes things cause talented teams to appear untalented. There’s a reason I mentioned 1967 to you. That was the year after the Rupp’s Runts national runner-up season, where we were #1 wire to wire. We returned most of that squad, except Larry Conley and went 13-13. A lot of people felt that morale destroyed that team. The post 1966 world was a completely different monster for Kentucky basketball and while individual numbers looked good for Riley, there were people who said he wasn’t mentally the same after ‘66. Rupp coached that squad and he was responsible for the results, but make no mistake that team was both talented and stunk.

1976 is an example of a team that had a world of talent. Larry Johnson, Goose Givens, Mike Phillips, James Lee. Problem there is an injury to Rick Robey detailed the season. He came back late and we won the NIT. Very talented team, nowhere near “Kentucky standards”, although we should acknowledge that was prior to 64 team field so an NIT title meant more then.

I don’t expect everyone to agree on everything, but honesty and consistency matter to me on this topic. Why? Suppose Pope doesn’t fix this and gets fired…how we diagnose the failure today will affect how we try to fix it in the future. There are coaches out there that could kill it here, but if people come to the wrong conclusions today those guys won’t get a shot and we will be right back here arguing again about why we stink.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RunninRichie

Joerupp1

Sophomore
Oct 3, 2025
87
129
33
I didn’t ask what the team’s flaws were. Every team has flaws. By the way the 1966 Rupp’s runts played a tight rotation as well. I’m asking you to be consistent here. Go ahead and say the 1967 and 1976 teams were untalented. I dare ya

I don’t think talent is the problem at all, but at least those people are consistent.

You can always tell when you’re dealing with dishonesty if someone can’t answer a basic question. Is the 1967 team untalented? Also, is the 1976 team untalented?

Call it surrender if you want. You could t answer the question and I don’t blame you. It wasn’t in your best interest to stand by the fire. Don’t worry, 99% of the website agrees with you and you’ll be get away with nonsense because it reinforces their presuppositions. No team looks talented while playing awful basketball, it doesn’t undermine the truth. I didn’t bring up the 2021 team, very talented—- awful roster fit. Multiple guys playing in the league and went 9-16. I just wish people tried to dig deeper rather than always being lazy and calling everything a talent issue. Pope is responsible for this clunker — in my mind, even more so. Because he was handed a lot.

You didn’t my question so I won’t answer yours. Yes, it was clear I was painting you into a corner. That was not a stealth mission. I’ll leave it there.
You need a Snickers!
 

Weston36

All-Conference
Dec 1, 2025
1,951
3,248
113
My biggest takeaway from the interview is that it would not be realistic to expect Mark Pope to come out and blast JMI and trash his athletic director. In the first place that would be like one of our players going to the media and talking all sorts of trash about a teammate. These people still have to work with each other.

More practically if Pope is in fact feeling the pressure the biggest thing he could do to heat up his own seat would be to publicly criticize his boss. He is much better off to brush aside his critics rather than to bite one of the biggest hands that feeds him. So if you were expecting some sort of blunt exposure from Mark Pope on this I don't know what you were thinking.
 
Last edited:

Kentucky15

All-Conference
Mar 29, 2013
2,033
4,224
108
My biggest takeaway from the interview is that it would not be realistic to expect Mark Pope to come out and blast JMI and trash his athletic director. In the first place that would be like one of our players going to the media and talking all sorts of trash about a teammate. These people still have to work with each other.

More practically if Pope is in fact feeling the pressure the biggest thing he could do to heat up his own seat would be to publicly criticize his boss. He is much better off to brush aside his critics that to bite one of the biggest hands that feeds him. So if you were expecting some sort of blunt exposure from Mark Pope on this I don't know what you were thinking.
It’s not that, I don’t expect him to blast them. If he really cares, he won’t blast them, but he will just accept accountability and say nothing about JMI or Barnhart. That’s now what he did. He’s using it for cover because Mitch must be the AD for him to keep his job. That I won’t do. The media needs to ask, nobody is going by rules. The ncaa is giving no sanctions. Why are you following rules that no one else is even the NCAA?

Mark needs Mitch right now so I want them both gone. They’re coving to maintain jobs during vast underperformance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fisherscatfan

Kentucky15

All-Conference
Mar 29, 2013
2,033
4,224
108
Wow. You guys go to work tomorrow and call a press conference and in it announce your boss is an incompetent crook. See what happens. Yet that's exactly what some of you want Pope to do. Grow up!
Again, say NOTHING about it. Talk about YOURSELF and accountability for putting a terrible product on the floor. Getting into “everyone else is cheating so” and “gaslighting us about JMI is total BS and not going to work here. He needs Mitch for his own job security and Mitch wants a guy he can control. He’s had no control in 15 years and he’s got the guy that gives him that. No more back scratching. This is Kentucky. PRODUCE.
 

fisherscatfan

All-Conference
Jan 17, 2010
1,157
2,533
113
I started a thread a few days ago asking if Pope was just being a good soldier and staying quiet. Well in no way did I expect him to blast Barnhart or JMI but to say they are great etc was not too bright. Now he owns it 100%.

Pope says he has great support well then POPE owns it all. The no players signed is on him. He doesn’t seem to want a GM. The erring on the side of not breaking rules when NOBODY knows the rules is just stupid. Is everybody but UK going to get punished. He better turn it around ASAP.

I just have ZERO confidence after watching that conference in him, Mitch or anything associated with UK Athletics that this isn’t a complete cluster.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RunninRichie

*Fox2Monk*

Heisman
Jun 10, 2009
46,182
84,218
113
Interesting twist to the cycle:
  1. Pope bungles recruiting and loses games in a catastrophic start to the season.
  2. His camp blames JMI due to heat
  3. Inconvenient info about JMI and Barnhart comes out
  4. Pope loves JMI and Barnhart

What will the update be if they lose to IU tomorrow night?

I don't think I've been this down in the dumps since probation.
We will find out after yet another disappointing game I’m sure. I don’t want to lose to Indiana but I have a nasty feeling threes are about to rain down in Rupp and it won’t be us doing it.
 

*Fox2Monk*

Heisman
Jun 10, 2009
46,182
84,218
113
It's not a good roster. The talent isn't there. Our best player is Otega Oweh or Collin Chandler. Both of those guys would be 8th off the bench, on great UK teams. You can say, it looks good on paper. But, on the court is all that matters. Bruce Pearl and many others have said we paid for a bunch of backups. Mostly because Pope's actual talented targets all said no thanks.

Just because the media and fans glazed it, doesn't mean it's good. We had guys thinking Devin Askew was the best point guard in the class in 2020. The media also glazed the 2020 team. Boston and Clarke were comapred to Wall and Bledsoe.
Oweh and Chandler are great starter level players, they just can’t carry a roster unfortunately which is ridiculous for the cash we spent. Maybe JQ changes some of that but without an elite PG and backup we are fraudulent anyway.