This is what you all asked for
- Thread starter eyesofhawk
- Start date
Jesus Christ, you are a f*cking idiot.21-21 2nd Q.
Yeah. Offense moving the ball 100% is why the defense is struggling.
X%Yeah. Offense moving the ball 100% is why the defense is struggling.
You ******* idiot. We asked for decent offense and our normal defense. I just knew you would be saying this ****.21-21 2nd Q.
The offense going 3 and out and backwards helped the defense. Losing some studs at LB and an offense moving the ball is definitely hurting the defense.
He, like all of us, would rather you quit posting.
This is more entertaining. I asked for our offense to get better, not our defense get ******. You know they can both be good, right?
No. Defense can only be good with the offense going 3 and out and turning the ball over at an alarming rate. Defense can’t be good when the offense can score 14 points or more…it’s basically impossible.
I like most people asked for an average offensive performance that can complement the defense when needed. How'd this thread age for you?
Place any bets tonight? Didn't see you bragging at halftime before losing your ***.
Place any bets tonight? Didn't see you bragging at halftime before losing your ***.
21-21 because it means the offense is working and I am extremely confident that Parker will make adjustments that work. He almost always does.
And he absolutely did tonight.
I eagerly await OP to come back and explain how he won his bet even though he lost.
He’s going to write us a book about how if Iowa had played offense like they previously did, Rutgers somehow would’ve not moved the ball, and it would’ve been a 10-7 game at half because the defense would’ve played better. “ACKCHYUALLY!!! LOSIN MY SHIRT ON THIS BET WAS A WIN”
Most fun I've had watching an Iowa game in years. The only thing that comes close is watching Nebraska piss down their leg at every opportunity.21-21 2nd Q.
Rewriting War and Peace on the premise that a 10-7 final score, with more points than passing yards, is actually a good thing.
38 points, 518 yards of offense and won the turnover battle. I like it...
He’s too busy cleaning the crap out of his pants due to the offense scoring 31 points and the defense only giving up 7 in the second half. He’s definitely one dumb sob.
346 yards of offense… but for Iowa it felt like 518!
Of course, why wouldn't you? Plus we were almost completely balanced.
172 return yards, 186 passing, 160 rushing. Perfection. Balance...
Post in thread 'Underdogs the Rest of the Season' https://www.on3.com/boards/threads/underdogs-the-rest-of-the-season.8263990/post-170791856He’s going to write us a book about how if Iowa had played offense like they previously did, Rutgers somehow would’ve not moved the ball, and it would’ve been a 10-7 game at half because the defense would’ve played better. “ACKCHYUALLY!!! LOSIN MY SHIRT ON THIS BET WAS A WIN”
Not sure where OP ever expressed doubt in Iowa winning the game.
Post #41 in linked thread. Since I know most of you are too lazy to click: It’s from Sept. 12th. And it reveals heavy action on Iowa, which ended up amounting to my 2nd largest bet of the year.
Game didn't go at all as I expected. But will spend all the same.
Cool GIF's, or whether they're called, and stuff, though guys.
Go Hawks and good night
Last edited:
Way to bypass your message of saying the offense is causing the defense to be bad…..
No such message was posted.Way to bypass your message of saying the offense is causing the defense to be bad…..
It's called proving these idiots wrong, like usual
Iowa won. That's a fact. You proved no one wrong. No one lives in your losing is really winning and winning is really losing reality.