Is a CRUEL FASCIST WIDELY HATED BY THE WORLD AND MOST OF AMERICA.
And there is ZERO you can do to stop Trump from making America GREAT AGAIN
GET USE TO BEING A LOSER FOR MANY YEARS
Is a CRUEL FASCIST WIDELY HATED BY THE WORLD AND MOST OF AMERICA.
You in particular are one of the people I am talking about. How many times have you said that everyone is doing the fraud that Trump committed when getting his loan? You have repeatedly stated that over and over. Like within the past week I believe since his case and the penalty has come up. It wasn't just misrepresenting Mar A Lago, it was claiming multitudes of square footage on a penthouse that didn't exist, and many more things. But you keep stating in all caps how much it doesn't bother you about Trump. That you are loving what he is doing. Zero public trust has been betrayed by him to you. But Cook claims residence in two places and suddenly public trust has been betrayed and you need people that are lily white clean.
Again, if she is guilty, I say treat her exactly like you would anyone else found to have claimed residence in two homes, and move forward. (And I don't know what that is, do they just pay back pay? Are they going to prison for that? (I doubt it)).
It's the "virtue signaling" or whatever the opposite is of that that I find humorous and over the top.
He is making America the OPPOSITE of GREAT and ONLY a LOSER in the 38% wouldn't recognize that FACTAnd there is ZERO you can do to stop Trump from making America GREAT AGAIN
GET USE TO BEING A LOSER FOR MANY YEARS
He is making America the OPPOSITE of GREAT and ONLY a LOSER in the 38% wouldn't recognize that FACT
LOL, you live in a foggy red bubble by choice and we all know your only source of news is FoxNews, the Tofurkey of the news industry.It was just announced by some pollsters Trump has the highest public support at this time in his Presidency as a few recent one.
Also on the ground polls are showing that such policies as hard on crime is a 90/10 or higher issue.
I just need to take a nap on you as for the next 3 1/2 years Trump is your worse nightmare.
Hope you find a Happy Place to go to.

I’m really not miserable at all.I am going to pass on explaining anymore about Trump and just enjoy the reality that for the next 3 1/2 years Trump is going to reign SUPREME and own the Democrats.
Trump is going to make America Golden.
You can be miserable. I am going to LOVE IT.
LOL, you live in a foggy red bubble by choice and we all know your only source of news is FoxNews, the Tofurkey of the news industry.
And I was wrong about 38%, the latest poll shows his approval at 37%. That's you they're talking about and not many others.
View attachment 889800
![]()
How popular is Donald Trump?
Silver Bulletin approval ratings for President Trump — and all presidents since Truman.www.natesilver.net
![]()
Trump's approval rating hits new second term low, poll shows
The president's approval rating has continued to slide amid economic and foreign policy worries.www.newsweek.com
LMAO, Nate Silver is using 10 polls, including ones from Trump friendly pollsters and all of them except one show him underwater. Time to accept the fact that Trump is a deeply unpopular president Gramps, despite what Maria Bartiromo and Jesse Watters tell you on your tv. You need to accept that you're in the minority by a wide margin and it will only get wider.Keep watching the fake biased polls
They are the same ones predicting Kamala Harris was a shoo in
Those polls find suckers to pay for what the people want to hear
I haven't forgotten, but here's the thing, and i'm not sticking up for trump, but until he's found guilty and sentenced then.....Ned: You forgot about Trump inciting the January 6 insurrection and the Supreme Court subsequently giving him a free pass for it, even though the clear language of the 14th Amendment should have made him ineligible for any elective office.
And you forgot about him stealing hundreds of boxes of documents belonging to the Federal Government (many of them classified), and subsequently blowing off the National Archives when it asked, then demanded, their return. With considerable assistance from that sycophantic District Judge in Florida (I forget her name), Trump managed to run out the clock on that prosecution, but it does not change the fact that he committed those crimes.
Hopefully, he will be prosecuted when his term as President ceases (if he does not stroke out before then).
Kangaroo court in downtown NY City. Nope.Cook was doing a public deal? What do you mean his conduct wasn't illegal? He was literally convicted by a jury of his peers.
Based on the evidence that is public, you don’t think he signed fraudulent documents? Is your argument that he was framed or that it just isn’t a big deal?Kangaroo court in downtown NY City. Nope.
He did not. The entire crux of the charge is they are stating he overvalued his collateral holding value to get loans. He has long since paid those loans off with interest also. Many independent experts stated NY grossly undervalued his holdings in the charges. It's all bs and this is compared to Cook who absolutely fraudulently claimed two separate homes as her primary residence within just a few weeks time-frame.Based on the evidence that is public, you don’t think he signed fraudulent documents? Is your argument that he was framed or that it just isn’t a big deal?
I’m really not miserable at all.
I just think your reaction to this is silly and performative and was pointing out a clear hypocrisy.
I think it’s fine to not really care about what Trump did. I understand why a supporter of his would feel like all big businesses likely do it, or he was just signing and someone else handled it, etc. But I just think it’s literally funny that that would be your opinion, but someone with a much smaller, less important, less public job checks a box incorrectly that saves herself some money (hurting no one personally, not changing her vote for this money or anything) and it’s such a huge deal.
It’s just funny.
So he didn’t say his penthouse was three times larger than it is?He did not. The entire crux of the charge is they are stating he overvalued his collateral holding value to get loans. He has long since paid those loans off with interest also. Many independent experts stated NY grossly undervalued his holdings in the charges. It's all bs and this is compared to Cook who absolutely fraudulently claimed two separate homes as her primary residence within just a few weeks time-frame.
TigerGrowls: He was overvaluing various properties for one purpose (e.g., to qualify for mortgage loans) and undervaluing them for another purpose (real property taxes and federal estate taxes, which are typically computed with reference to the FMV of the subject property). And he was doing so contemporaneously. How does that not constitute fraud?He did not. The entire crux of the charge is they are stating he overvalued his collateral holding value to get loans. He has long since paid those loans off with interest also. Many independent experts stated NY grossly undervalued his holdings in the charges. It's all bs and this is compared to Cook who absolutely fraudulently claimed two separate homes as her primary residence within just a few weeks time-frame.
The only fraud that matters and means you aren’t worthy of public office is if you’re on the Fed’s board.TigerGrowls: He was overvaluing various properties for one purpose (e.g., to qualify for mortgage loans) and undervaluing them for another purpose (real property taxes and federal estate taxes, which are typically computed with reference to the FMV of the subject property). And he was doing so contemporaneously. How does that not constitute fraud?
TigerGrowls: He was overvaluing various properties for one purpose (e.g., to qualify for mortgage loans) and undervaluing them for another purpose (real property taxes and federal estate taxes, which are typically computed with reference to the FMV of the subject property). And he was doing so contemporaneously. How does that not constitute fraud?
I'm afraid growls might be caught up in an argument similar to those who downplay Cook's fraud on mortgage applications. I own more than one house and have been tempted many times to claim primary residence on all of them at mortgage application time. I don't think there's any doubt that information on trump's loan applications was correct. Clearly it was not. Similarly, and this is where fair debate comes in , the court substantially undervalued some of his properties. Valuing Mar a Lago at $28million is laughable.TigerGrowls: He was overvaluing various properties for one purpose (e.g., to qualify for mortgage loans) and undervaluing them for another purpose (real property taxes and federal estate taxes, which are typically computed with reference to the FMV of the subject property). And he was doing so contemporaneously. How does that not constitute fraud?
This is not apples to apples imo. Not the same stated crime.I'm afraid growls might be caught up in an argument similar to those who downplay Cook's fraud on mortgage applications. I own more than one house and have been tempted many times to claim primary residence on all of them at mortgage application time. I don't think there's any doubt that information on trump's loan applications was correct. Clearly it was not. Similarly, and this is where fair debate comes in , the court substantially undervalued some of his properties. Valuing Mar a Lago at $28million is laughable.
Similar circumstances it appears for Cook...still to be proven for sure. But from what I've seen, she was not 100% forthright on her applications.
To me if one was indicted so should the other...and so should James and Schiff - if the fraud is provable,
Fair is fair, and no one is above the law.
Disagree with your opinion here. No one in NY was ever indicted for anything similar to what they went after Trump for. The bank lenders even came in and vouched for him. This is lunacy.TigerGrowls: He was overvaluing various properties for one purpose (e.g., to qualify for mortgage loans) and undervaluing them for another purpose (real property taxes and federal estate taxes, which are typically computed with reference to the FMV of the subject property). And he was doing so contemporaneously. How does that not constitute fraud?
So he didn’t say his penthouse was three times larger than it is?
TigerGrowls: He was overvaluing various properties for one purpose (e.g., to qualify for mortgage loans) and undervaluing them for another purpose (real property taxes and federal estate taxes, which are typically computed with reference to the FMV of the subject property). And he was doing so contemporaneously. How does that not constitute fraud?
He’s consistently inconsistent. I’ll say that about our friend huckleberry.I’m pretty sure you posted that “no one is above the law” not that long ago
did you have a change of heart or do you want a two-tier justice system?
Literally every land/property developer in the history of the world does this. What’s your point. Hell I personally try to undervalue my own property for tax purposes too. The law was being applied in this way because who the defendant was, period. The entire world knows that. And guess what, making him a felon didn’t work anyway. He’s still your president.TigerGrowls: He was overvaluing various properties for one purpose (e.g., to qualify for mortgage loans) and undervaluing them for another purpose (real property taxes and federal estate taxes, which are typically computed with reference to the FMV of the subject property). And he was doing so contemporaneously. How does that not constitute fraud?
I absolutely do not know every detail. I am also not sitting here saying that this action (while it absolutely was fraud by the organization, full stop) is that big of a deal, or a personal travesty, or a huge deal where everyone involved should resign in disgrace. Just saying everyone's comments on a Fed Board member are funny in light of this. But to my other question, if an AG were to do the same thing Cook has done, claim more than one primary residence, is that a position where you would expect them to resign due to that?I laugh every time I see people say Trump said something or did something
Trump has people to do these things
Do you really think Trump measured the penthouse
No someone else measured it and in the end all he did was sign the final documents
The CEO of a major corporation does not have time for the tiny
He has to do the big
Yes he is ultimately responsible for the conduct of every employee as to their actions and his management and response to those actions but he does not have puppet strings controlling them
Sometimes employees accidentally or purposely go off the rails
I assume you work for someone so I pose the question to you foes your boss know every detail or watch like a hawk your every breath you take
Hopefully NOT LOL
You’re not asking me but I’d say this. I think no one would care if the left hadn’t done what they did to Trump. It’s that simple. We live in a morally relativistic world and there two opposing forces here. If you strike one they want to strike back. That’s been my position all along. IMO the left started this lawfare by trying to make a guy a felon, not because of what he did, but because of who he is. Now it’s on and the other side wants their pound of flesh. It’s completely natural. You may think one is a more serious crime than the other but that doesn’t matter. It’s revenge.I absolutely do not know every detail. I am also not sitting here saying that this action (while it absolutely was fraud by the organization, full stop) is that big of a deal, or a personal travesty, or a huge deal where everyone involved should resign in disgrace. Just saying everyone's comments on a Fed Board member are funny in light of this. But to my other question, if an AG were to do the same thing Cook has done, claim more than one primary residence, is that a position where you would expect them to resign due to that?
I absolutely do not know every detail. I am also not sitting here saying that this action (while it absolutely was fraud by the organization, full stop) is that big of a deal, or a personal travesty, or a huge deal where everyone involved should resign in disgrace. Just saying everyone's comments on a Fed Board member are funny in light of this. But to my other question, if an AG were to do the same thing Cook has done, claim more than one primary residence, is that a position where you would expect them to resign due to that?
If someone were in the role of AG, should they also resign for claiming more than one primary residence?
Have you called for Ken Paxton to resign?I would say that any obvious attempts to circumvent US law is a serious issue for a public servant if that public servant is particularly responsible for the enforcement of those laws.
Point on Trump us the massive business portfolios he is responsible for assure one that there are COMPLIANCE ISSUES.
That is my point with him. Thats why companies have lawyers to handle the constant litany of issues. If one disqualified a Fortune 500 from doing business with the government due to fraud of mistakes there would be no one left to do business with the government.
I felt the same way watching supposed unbiased judges doing everything they could to get a conviction for a victimless crime. Seems we all are seeing humor in this, just at different points.Have you called for Ken Paxton to resign?
With Trump, while I think it was a crime so to speak, I really don't truly care about it. I do suspect that it is somewhat common (over claiming on loan applications, then underclaiming on tax documents). My main point has really just been that it humors me seeing people act just over the top offended some random person on a Fed board apparently did something that also just isn't that big of a deal to me.
If it helps, while I think the crime was committed, I also wasn't offended by what Trump did, and didn't feel it was worthy of that trial/conviction/etc, or call for him to drop out of the election due to it.I felt the same way watching supposed unbiased judges doing everything they could to get a conviction for a victimless crime. Seems we all are seeing humor in this, just at different points.
If our government officials, in any position, are gaming the system then they need to be fired.If someone were in the role of AG, should they also resign for claiming more than one primary residence?
I agree with what you’re getting at for the most part. What I’m saying is many of us felt he was being railroaded, trivially, because of who he is. Now it’s happening to the other side and they don’t like it. Take the specific crimes and throw it out the window. Both things are not that big a deal and if they’d been done by you or I no one would care. I’m simply reminding the left that they put him through hell in court for nothing so don’t complain when it happens to them. They set the precedent for this immature crap. I don’t like either side doing it, but damn at some point you have to fight back. That’s what I like about Trump the most. Not his politics but his ability to weather any and everything the left throws at him. I know you don’t like him and that’s ok too.If it helps, while I think the crime was committed, I also wasn't offended by what Trump did, and didn't feel it was worthy of that trial/conviction/etc, or call for him to drop out of the election due to it.
Have you called for Ken Paxton to resign?
With Trump, while I think it was a crime so to speak, I really don't truly care about it. I do suspect that it is somewhat common (over claiming on loan applications, then underclaiming on tax documents). My main point has really just been that it humors me seeing people act just over the top offended some random person on a Fed board apparently did something that also just isn't that big of a deal to me.
Oh, the irony.....There should not be two tiers of justice in this country. If anything, the people elected to office should be held to a higher standard than everyone else.
Sure, and if that were the line I were seeing on here, it wouldn't make me laugh. It may frustrate me, because it feels like I just want both sides to be better, but I at least would understand it. All the holier than thou talk is what is humoring me. That's all I've been saying. Say "turnabout is fair play" etc, fine. I won't like it, just like I didn't love the NY AG thing either. But at least that is genuine. That's all.I agree with what you’re getting at for the most part. What I’m saying is many of us felt he was being railroaded, trivially, because of who he is. Now it’s happening to the other side and they don’t like it. Take the specific crimes and throw it out the window. Both things are not that big a deal and if they’d been done by you or I no one would care. I’m simply reminding the left that they put him through hell in court for nothing so don’t complain when it happens to them. They set the precedent for this immature crap. I don’t like either side doing it, but damn at some point you have to fight back. That’s what I like about Trump the most. Not his politics but his ability to weather any and everything the left throws at him. I know you don’t like him and that’s ok too.