My Thoughts

brgRC90

Heisman
Apr 8, 2008
34,957
15,859
0
Every single year injuries are trotted out as an excuse, as if we have more of them every single year than anyone else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Henry Rutgers

brgRC90

Heisman
Apr 8, 2008
34,957
15,859
0
We dont have more than others, but we have less depth than the majority of teams in our division of the B10. Our #1s sometimes are as good or better than elite teams. Our #2s rarely are.
Maybe. You find a way to win or you don't. Schiano and his fans remind me of George McClellan, always calling for more time and more troops and always making excuses and rarely delivering much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Henry Rutgers

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
8,459
4,691
66
It's not complicated. He is a fine QB when the running game is working and he can pass enough to keep everyone honest. This is the case with average to mediocre defenses/programs. However, he lacks the ability to pass when he is forced to (i.e., the defense is good enough to stop our run). In these situations, he has proven to be completely non-functional and overwhelmed.
i suppose you mean ‘adequate’ and not ‘fine’ in that specific scenario. The problem is, that approach doesn’t work against good teams (2.0 hasn’t beaten any with a winning record), so he’s simply not good enough at the position when we need him to do something besides handing off or running it himself.

We all agree the offense is one dimensional because of his deficiencies.
 

MADHAT1

Heisman
Apr 1, 2003
31,733
16,537
113
Except they're not good points, just dead horses that certain posters on this board like to beat.
won't argue about issues being beat to death by those just wanting to bash Gavin, Schiano and the program.
But I never put my 2 cents in on how I felt about Greg being involved in the way KC called plays and how I felt about Wimsatt's QB skills
So saw an opportunity and took it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Henry Rutgers

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
89,582
87,553
113
+1
To summarize the OP:

You:
Smart Ass Butthead GIF
 
  • Like
Reactions: shields

zebnatto

All-Conference
May 7, 2008
5,071
3,818
0
I agree that I’d like to see Gavin run for, but primarily to keep a defender off the running back, rather than because any great running ability from the quarterback spot that I see from Gavin. He is not the kind of runner who is quick, fast, yes, but not with a sudden burst, he can’t juke anyone out, and he doesn’t lower the. Shoulder and push the pile for an extra two or 3 yards. His best running play may be a quarterback draw, where if he can get past the rushers, he’s got several yards before the first defender greets him. Again, I’d like to see him run more, but not so much that it’s his strength, but that it will help the running back.
 

mdk02

Heisman
Aug 18, 2011
26,842
19,130
113
Maybe. You find a way to win or you don't. Schiano and his fans remind me of George McClellan, always calling for more time and more troops and always making excuses and rarely delivering much.

That might be a reasonable analogy if McClellan didn't have the equivalent of Ohio St. or Michigan with regards to the troops, arms and supplies. He did.
 

CollegeSenior

All-Conference
Apr 2, 2021
1,377
2,288
66
@gef21 given the limited tools KC and GS have to work with, in your eyes is there anything they can do to improve the output? Or is what we are getting the best we can expect?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kbee3

winfield102

All-Conference
Jun 15, 2005
7,135
2,777
113
We completely imploded against Iowa. It felt like the players and the coaches never got off the bus, which is frustrating after showing fight against Michigan and OSU.

A better opponent requires absolutely PERFECT play by RU. There is no margin for error with this limited offense and special teams. Hopefully with an upgrade in talent, we will be able to overcome mistakes and GS won't be so conservative.

After the 3rd possession, it felt like it was over for us. The false start on our 1st possession in the 2nd half eliminated any glimmer of hope.

Beat Maryland to finish strong. Forget about the PSU game. I'm not even thinking about that game.
 

RUevolution36

All-American
Sep 18, 2006
8,169
5,649
113
During the COVID year, we threw caution to the wind and were the trick play specialists. Against PSU, if we find that our vanilla game plan doesn't work, why not go to the gadget plays? Nothing to lose...we're going to be big underdogs anyway.
 

brgRC90

Heisman
Apr 8, 2008
34,957
15,859
0
That might be a reasonable analogy if McClellan didn't have the equivalent of Ohio St. or Michigan with regards to the troops, arms and supplies. He did.
Iowa and Wisconsin are not Ohio State and Michigan. But the main point you missed is that sometimes you have to go ahead and work with what you have and stop demanding more time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUShea

LETSGORU91_

All-American
Jan 29, 2017
6,500
7,245
0
First off, gef21 looks at more than the stat sheet, if he's even looking at the stat sheet at all.

Your question goes back to everything else involved in having a good pass efficiency and completion percentage. We don't have WRs that can consistently get separation or catch imperfect balls, and we don't have a pass receiving TE. Our RB room is banged up. That doesn't forgive GW entirely - but he seems to be an average QB without above average guys at the skill positions to take up the gap.

Couple that with going against some of the best defenses in college football. The national leaders in pass efficiency defense are #1 Ohio St, #2 Michigan, and #4 Iowa. Our other loss, Wisconsin, comes in at 27th - and Penn State this weekend clocks in at #10. Northwestern is #39, and VTech is #41. It's not like we're going up against average defenses each week.
Hmmm...good points and taking them into consideration, I just don't see average at this time.
I am taking into account what he has done on the ground, and he has made some nice throws. If we are grading on a sliding scale of all NCAA QBs then he is an F for completion percentages. There are many, many more stats to consider besides just completion percentage.
He has made some nice throws but has made some real head scratchers. He hasn't done much on the ground lately even when it seems obvious he should pull the ball back and run. Is that his decision or one predetermined by the coaches, which is even worse, because wide open running lanes are there and they aren't letting him decide. I'll add INTs, percentage of interceptions per dropback and Pick 6s to some of the many stats to consider as well. I'm just not seeing it and I really want him to succeed by the way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUChoppin

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
8,459
4,691
66
No, we don't all agree to that statement. It's too oversimplified to be accurate.

Our passing game struggles due to a combination of problems with multiple players. Not solely because of GW

then what’s the alternate explanation for his QB ranking around the very bottom in several categories ? are his receivers as a group also among the very worst in the country ? Is the OL pass-blocking the worst in the country ? is the playcalling the worst in the country and responsible for his poor passing ? does the eye test say something different than the stats ?

If the answer to these questions is no, the only valid conclusion on the futility of the near-lowest ranked passing game is that it’s primarily him.

Great athlete but poor QB, unfortunately. Athleticism isn’t a requirement for the position. Just the other day we saw an overweight, backup oaf QB also without top receivers completely outplay him.
 
Last edited:
Jun 7, 2001
36,462
43,818
113
Maybe. You find a way to win or you don't. Schiano and his fans remind me of George McClellan, always calling for more time and more troops and always making excuses and rarely delivering much.
Schiano delivered a bowl bid, no thanks to you. He delivered competitive games for three quarters against elite competition, despite talent constraints.

There’s no finding a way to win if you lack troops and resources. McClellan had ample amounts of both. And that is why he was fired.

Rutgers does not, when it comes to competing against OSU, PSU, and Michigan. The differences are stark, and noticeable, as soon as you step on the respective campuses. So your analogy, as usual, is invalid.

We need more talent on the offensive side of the ball, and thankfully it’s on its way. But we have to build the infrastructure to sustain a successful program that can be competitive with the elite programs in the conference.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: brgRC90

yesrutgers01

Heisman
Nov 9, 2008
122,599
38,363
113
then what’s the explanation for his QB ranking around the very bottom in several categories ? are his receivers as a group also among the very worst in the country ? Is the OL pass-blocking the worst in the country ? is the playcalling responsible for his poor passing ? does the eye test say something different than the stats ?

If the answer to these questions is no, the only valid conclusion on the futility of the passing game is that it’s primarily him.
GW needs to fix some things but also curious what Teel’s QB ranking was in 2005.
 

brgRC90

Heisman
Apr 8, 2008
34,957
15,859
0
Schiano delivered a bowl bid, no thanks to you. He delivered competitive games for three quarters against elite competition, despite talent constraints.

There’s no finding a way to win if you lack troops and resources. McClellan had ample amounts of both. And that is why he was fired.

Rutgers does not, when it comes to competing against OSU, PSU, and Michigan. The differences are stark, and noticeable, as soon as you step on the respective campuses. So your analogy, as usual, is invalid.

We need more talent on the offensive side of the ball, and thankfully it’s on its way. But we have to build the infrastructure to sustain a successful program that can be competitive with the elite programs in the conference.
Schiano gets $4 million per year and I'm supposed to give more to him so he can coach a QB to throw a pass? Your only song is gimmegimmegimme.
 

RuSnp

All-Conference
Jan 14, 2004
3,525
3,033
0
GW needs to fix some things but also curious what Teel’s QB ranking was in 2005.
As bad as Teel was statistically as a frosh (2 tds, 10 picks) he was a 50% passer and produced 6.8 yds/attempt in 2005. Gavin - 22 career starts in - is 6.1 this year and is a career 46.7% passer.
 

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
8,459
4,691
66
As bad as Teel was statistically as a frosh (2 tds, 10 picks) he was a 50% passer and produced 6.8 yds/attempt in 2005. Gavin - 22 career starts in - is 6.1 this year and is a career 46.7% passer.
and this is Gavin’s third year in Schiano’s stable, supposedly developing.
 
Jun 7, 2001
36,462
43,818
113
Schiano gets $4 million per year and I'm supposed to give more to him so he can coach a QB to throw a pass? Your only song is gimmegimmegimme.
We play in the Big 10, not Fantasyland.

Schiano’s 4 million is his coaches salary. Ryan Days salary is $10M. And Ohio State alum kicked in another $13M to fund NIL for their football team. If we want to compete with Ohio State, we will need to boost our NIL giving. Otherwise we will just have to accept that we will lose to them for the foreseeable future. Same with Iowa, though their nil support is on a smaller scale.

I know you don’t want to donate. But it’s hard for me to understand how you are so willing to run your mouth, despite your unwillingness to do so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TRU2RU_rivals

brgRC90

Heisman
Apr 8, 2008
34,957
15,859
0
We play in the Big 10, not Fantasyland.

Schiano’s 4 million is his coaches salary. Ryan Days salary is $10M. And Ohio State alum kicked in another $13M to fund NIL for their football team. If we want to compete with Ohio State, we will need to boost our NIL giving. Otherwise we will just have to accept that we will lose to them for the foreseeable future. Same with Iowa, though their nil support is on a smaller scale.

I know you don’t want to donate. But it’s hard for me to understand how you are so willing to run your mouth, despite your unwillingness to do so.
Gimmegimmegimme I can't score a single TD without millions more. But I deserve a raise.
 

krup

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
70,133
10,066
0
As a fan of both college and pro football, and someone who gets into the NFL Draft, I notice that one of the main concerns in evaluating a QB predraft is whether they will handle throwing into the tiny windows available against NFL defenses, because their WRs won’t often be wide open like they are in college.

Well, it’s not to say that Wimsatt doesn’t make some bad throws, but RU in the B1G is asking their QBs to perform more like an NFL QB than many schools (little WR separation, limited protection time).

That certainly doesn’t mean he should hang onto the job regardless of performance (like the Jets sticking will Wilson because they drafted him high), and we should definitely try and bring in more competition for him, but I would like to see him with an upgraded WR group that can get separation and especially some viable pass catching TEs.
 

shields

Heisman
Aug 5, 2002
79,992
17,887
113
Once we were behind we had no chance. That defense is good and Sutton i thought struggled. Agree with Al. We are bowl eligible. Have won every game that was 50/50 to me. Va Tech and Indiana etc. people love to complain. Iowa is 8-2. Did not expect to win out there.
 
Last edited:

yesrutgers01

Heisman
Nov 9, 2008
122,599
38,363
113
Teel also had Rice and Leonard. And Zuttah on the line.
At any given time- and Mike is one of my favorites. But on his OL through his years- 5 guys that have at least started mult games in the NFL- Zuttah, Davis, Stephenson,Stapleton, Haslam. 2 guys that had mult years in camps- Fladell, Ryan B, and a top performer in college that got injured, Sosa.
Mult years- we led the NCAA in least sacks given up.
 
Jun 7, 2001
36,462
43,818
113
at the very least, we should have a full wide receiver room next season. Right now we have a banged up Jackson, freshman Strong and two healthy possession receivers in Washington and Dremel. Between this year's freshman class and next year's, there's a lot of players that should be able to contribute.
Next year the freshman class will be acclimating, so in two years we’ll be exactly where we want to be.
 

shields

Heisman
Aug 5, 2002
79,992
17,887
113
Long is gone for year and Jackson hurt. The receivers have to be worst group in Big Ten. Why Rochelle does not get a reverse once in a while confuses me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rokodesh

Scarlet16e2

All-Conference
Nov 22, 2005
9,003
4,069
113
Really tough game for the OLine. Seemed to me that they were still spent from their great game vs Ohio State. Mentally and physically.
Pre-snap penalties, poor run blocking, etc. When we can’t establish the running game and control time of possession we are done. We just don’t have the passing game to overcome that. It is what it is.
Still we are improved year over year by leaps and bounds.
Still Hoping we can steal one more win before the bowl game.
 

gef21

All-American
Jan 25, 2005
4,575
9,397
0
There are three issues from some fans.

1. They think they know football and they do not.

2. They think they know coaching kids and they do not.

3. Their ego gets really upset because they want to hang around the proverbial water cooler and dick measure with their coworkers who are OSU, MSU, Bama fans etc.

The same thing that hurts high school sports, and youth sports, make it really hard to talk about college sports with people.