We need to find a way to get as many youth and high school players, parents, and coaches in there as possible. These are our future players, students, and ticket buyers.
Who is going to drive there on a Thursday night without being sure they will get in??We need to find a way to get as many youth and high school players, parents, and coaches in there as possible. These are our future players, students, and ticket buyers.
Yep. Now let's do whatever needs to be done in order for more of us to be able to see those big, fast, black football players we love. On Saturdays at least.
I recall the criticisms of prior presidents. Apparently you do not. Without proof, either of our viewpoints are assumptions.
with a straight face, do you think race played no part in his hire? Also, 2 of those other hires were political hires which are equally as egregious.
it should be best man for the job
They may have but certainly none of you did so due to his race.
agree
The thing with the spring game is it's a good PR opportunity, drives sales, drives revenue, press etc etc.. GS learned that lesson that hard way so he knows, it should be an event for the RU base and fringe people
I agree but my point is its not on a Saturday. Week night.Whitebus, if we go to 30 percent, 16,000 , that would be toward the high end of what we get when the Spring Game is on Rutgers Day and a Saturday. We have hit 20,000 before, but I don’t see Holloway opening it up that much even though by Murphy we can go to 26,000.
Mccormick was definitely criticized as a privileged hire
It never occurred to me that race was part of the hire, why would it? Haven’t you seen or heard about his resume and track record. He was and is supremely qualified. He has had leadership positions at universities with far superior academics than Rutgers. What more was he supposed to accomplish before it is no longer considered a race hire?
No he wasn’t. He was already a university president at a large state school, a former vice chancellor, a former Rutgers dean and the son of a beloved professor and namesake of my freshman dorm. He grew up at Rutgers. His return was almost universally met with excitement at the return of a loyal son.
Yea I remember that. The narrative was that he only got the role because of who his dad was. It was pathetic given his credentials.you are new here...he definitely was criticized and basically its because he was privileged
Can you imagine the reaction from Schiano, Hobbs or Holloway if they read this thread?I see the Rutgers stormfront board is back in action.
you are new here...he definitely was criticized and basically its because he was privileged
I did and so did many here on the Barchi hire. He was here to do the merger and somehow as a political favor was promoted to President. Many here hated the hire and thought he was unqualified coming from Thomas Jefferson University.And nobody ever questioned whether those white Presidents, especially those who maybe didn't do so well at the job, were given that job because of race.
lol, now you are truly showing your ignoranceI’m not new to Rutgers nor the Rutgers community.
Fortunately, this board and your views are a reflection of a very small minority of Americans and even smaller minority of the Rutgers community.
absolutely, he was panned as a political hire, an appeasement nod. At least he had a resume to back the hireYea I remember that. The narrative was that he only got the role because of who his dad was. It was pathetic given his credentials.
Wish we had someone with those now.
what was the candidate pool? Funny how that never comes upIt never occurred to me that race was part of the hire, why would it? Haven’t you seen or heard about his resume and track record. He was and is supremely qualified. He has had leadership positions at universities with far superior academics than Rutgers. What more was he supposed to accomplish before it is no longer considered a race hire?
what was the candidate pool? Funny how that never comes up
You are kidding yourself if you think race, gender, sexual orientation, etc does NOT come up in these type hires. It ALWAYS and we can't move forward unless it stops. I'd bet few here ever really managed or ran something of import within a large org with broad reach. I'd wager a ton actually given the naivety on display.
This is true . But we have had our share of lousy white presidents : Lawrence , McCormick and barchi . Just blind odds Holloway is gonna be better than at least 1 of them .Of course it was a consideration. Especially now. Look how the AD hire went before Hobbs. Anyone who thinks otherwise is living in an alternate universe.
Join the group who don't get the point. Yes, some questioned the Barchi hire, especially sports fans with legitimate concerns about whether he'd care at all about sports, given his primary goal of overseeing the merger. But nobody said he was primarily hired because of his race, which people have said about Holloway since day one, despite his impressive qualifications.I did and so did many here on the Barchi hire. He was here to do the merger and somehow as a political favor was promoted to President. Many here hated the hire and thought he was unqualified coming from Thomas Jefferson University.
This is true . But we have had our share of lousy white presidents : Lawrence , McCormick and barchi . Just blind odds Holloway is gonna be better than at least 1 of them .
I believe most of us said it about Julie. That was gender based not race, but still probably stuck in the craw of you woke. I know I was quite vocal in the way Sweeney treated Sean Frazier.Join the group who don't get the point. Yes, some questioned the Barchi hire, especially sports fans with legitimate concerns about whether he'd care at all about sports, given his primary goal of overseeing the merger. But nobody said he was primarily hired because of his race, which people have said about Holloway since day one, despite his impressive qualifications.
Yes, but I am willing to bet Holloway will be better than at least 1 of them . Wouldn’t you ?Lawrence was a joke. Barchi was brought in for a very specific expertise. The merger. Everything else was ancillary.
McCormick had impeccable credentials. Say what you want about his hire but now one can question why he was hired. He had already earned that level.
Yes, but I am willing to bet Holloway will be better than at least 1 of them . Wouldn’t you ?
I would hope so. But he isn't exactly off to a rip roaring start.Yes, but I am willing to bet Holloway will be better than at least 1 of them . Wouldn’t you ?
How do you figure ? College president is not going to be judged by attendance at a spring football gameI would hope so. But he isn't exactly off to a rip roaring start.
Yes, but I am willing to bet Holloway will be better than at least 1 of them . Wouldn’t you ?
Someone will have higher position at rutgers and lower position at Yale . That’s the pecking order in academia.Why didn't he finish his 5 year commitment at Yale? He wasn't even the true Dean there. Yale did not give him oversight of the acadamic portion.
What are the early indicators you have seen that make you think he will be awful ?No, I definitely wouldn't take that bet. Not based off of early indications.
Colleges in NJ are having graduations in person. They are spreading them out in a logistical manner to abide by current rules. Holloway and his team of so called smart people couldn't figure it out but others could? Great leadership there. Seems his only mandate has been hide under your bed till you're vaccinated. What has he done so far that has astonished you? Hold the rest of the B1G hostage to have no fans in the stands otherwise he was going to vote NO and cancel having a season? Did Rutgers one of the most diverse Universities in the US really need a VP of Equity? What was the purpose of that to waste more money?How do you figure ? College president is not going to be judged by attendance at a spring football game
Your free to do so but when you try to box inWho cares? I'm expressing my own opinion, not live action role playing as a fan of a "big time program".
You're free to do so of course but when you try to put Rutgers fans in your " whiney" box it doesn't hurt to suggest we're far from unique in our reaction to the situation. In fact I'd say the few who say " who cares" or its just a scrimmage are the whiney ones because there bitching about a subject they don't care about.Who cares? I'm expressing my own opinion, not live action role playing as a fan of a "big time program".
We really going to judge a college president by football attendance ?Colleges in NJ are having graduations in person. They are spreading them out in a logistical manner to abide by current rules. Holloway and his team of so called smart people couldn't figure it out but others could? Great leadership there. Seems his only mandate has been hide under your bed till you're vaccinated. What has he done so far that has astonished you? Hold the rest of the B1G hostage to have no fans in the stands otherwise he was going to vote NO and cancel having a season?
The Knight Report Football
ESPN FPI projects Rutgers Football's 2026 schedule - Week Eight
The Knight Report
Join The Knight Report TODAY and get it for 60% off!
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football's KJ Duff named Big Ten Offensive Player of the Week
Rivals Basketball Recruiting
Border League East: Chase Lumpkin, Jayon Connor headline the top 10 performances
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football versus Michigan Game Time Announced