Is there a semblance of doubt

ScarletDave

Heisman
Oct 7, 2010
34,604
15,353
85
Is there anyone else who has buried, deep down, that Greg Schiano May actually not be hired, and we will end up with someone out of the MAC or something. There is definitely a lot of tension on this board and on twitter, no one is really mentioning this yet but I guess I’ll finally be the first one to say it, could this not happen ?? Scary thought.
 

Letitrip

All-Conference
Sep 4, 2007
2,389
4,226
66
If RU and Hobbs screw this up at this point heads need to roll big time. They would essentially have to start the search over and that would be inexcusable. I would also predict that season ticket sales will crater even further if a high risk second level coach is hired.

IMO they are just working out the details and Schiano wants to start out with everything he needs to be in place. He understands RU and the political landscape - that is a good thing.
 
Last edited:

Wolv RU

All-Conference
Nov 7, 2003
7,761
2,218
0
If RU and Hobbs screws this up at this point heads need to roll big time. They would essentially have to start the search over and that would be inexcusable. I would also predict that season ticket sales will crater even further if a high risk second level coach is hired.

IMO they are just working out the details and Schiano wants to start out with everything he needs to be in place. He understand RU and the political landscape - that is a good thing.

Reports are that Rutgers has agreed to all of Schiano's demands. What else would you have them do? If Schiano doesn't take the job, then it's because he didn't want it for whatever reason.
 

WhiteBus

Heisman
Oct 4, 2011
39,520
21,922
113
The RU Screw doesn't just apply to students.

I think at this point it's no better than 50/50.
 

Dpgru

All-Conference
Jan 17, 2015
4,603
4,761
0
Why are so many of you assuming that if it doesn’t get done it’s RU’s fault. He may not want RU as much as you “GS is God” folks want him. He just might change his mind and say thanks but no thanks. It takes two sides to make it a yes but either one can make it a no go.
 

King of S

All-Conference
Sep 20, 2017
3,436
2,808
113
Reports are that Rutgers has agreed to all of Schiano's demands. What else would you have them do? If Schiano doesn't take the job, then it's because he didn't want it for whatever reason.
Maybe Schiano just doesn’t want the job? Hard to tell at this point.
 

devoted2ru

All-Conference
Nov 27, 2006
5,432
2,796
0
I have no "inside info.", but I have to think that Hobbs, et al., know they've got, (and I mean GOT), to get this done. -If somehow they don't, the only thing that will prevent a fan meltdown that will make the Vesuvius eruption look small in comparison is if GS himself makes it clear he's the one who changed his mind even though RU was willing to meet his requirements. ...In truth, though, probably even that wouldn't be enough to quiet the resulting storm.

But frankly, I don't think things wouldn't have gotten this far if there was a real chance of Schiano bailing. (Just wish something would be announced so we'd know this thing has finally been nailed down.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: ATIOH

WhiteBus

Heisman
Oct 4, 2011
39,520
21,922
113
Why are so many of you assuming that if it doesn’t get done it’s RU’s fault. He may not want RU as much as you “GS is God” folks want him. He just might change his mind and say thanks but no thanks. It takes two sides to make it a yes but either one can make it a no go.
It does take two sides but if Rutgers isn't serious about doing football right than why should Schiano or any qualified HC come here? Rutgers always tries to go the cheap route. If that is the case and Schiano passes it not his doing.
 

KingHigh

All-American
Apr 12, 2005
21,293
9,216
0
My sources tell me that the facilities upgrades that Schiano demands requires support from Trenton and cannot be guaranteed by Rutgers in a vacuum. My sources confirmed that Phil Murphy and Schiano have met to discuss and that Murphy was supportive.
 

devoted2ru

All-Conference
Nov 27, 2006
5,432
2,796
0
My sources tell me that the facilities upgrades that Schiano demands requires support from Trenton and cannot be guaranteed by Rutgers in a vacuum. My sources confirmed that Phil Murphy and Schiano have met to discuss and that Murphy was supportive.

Interesting stuff, KingHigh. -Having Murphy's support is definitely an important piece needed to get this done.
 

Letitrip

All-Conference
Sep 4, 2007
2,389
4,226
66
Reports are that Rutgers has agreed to all of Schiano's demands. What else would you have them do? If Schiano doesn't take the job, then it's because he didn't want it for whatever reason.
I would not buy that narrative. Fact is if this fell through now than Hobbs and company have not been able to finalize the details that were agreed to with Schiano.
 

graystork

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2008
8,515
3,367
0
So Rutgers wants state tax credits before it goes forward with this, like the last building. Sounds reasonable.
 

Wolv RU

All-Conference
Nov 7, 2003
7,761
2,218
0
So Rutgers wants state tax credits before it goes forward with this, like the last building. Sounds reasonable.

Sounds from the latest reporting that this is the case. Otherwise, Rutgers does not generally need support from Trenton to build things on its own property.
 

ru66

All-American
Jul 28, 2001
12,175
6,257
0
this will not be a RU screw up if he chooses not to be hired--stop the wrong blame game
 
  • Like
Reactions: BuggsyRU

RUbacker

Heisman
Dec 5, 2014
16,034
22,700
108
Is there anyone else who has buried, deep down, that Greg Schiano May actually not be hired, and we will end up with someone out of the MAC or something. There is definitely a lot of tension on this board and on twitter, no one is really mentioning this yet but I guess I’ll finally be the first one to say it, could this not happen ?? Scary thought.
I think this gets done but I think there are some at RU trying to go a little cheap again. Haven5 they learned their lessons on going cheap?
 
Jul 25, 2001
53,200
35,896
0
Is there anyone else who has buried, deep down, that Greg Schiano May actually not be hired, and we will end up with someone out of the MAC or something. There is definitely a lot of tension on this board and on twitter, no one is really mentioning this yet but I guess I’ll finally be the first one to say it, could this not happen ?? Scary thought.
No
 

koleszar

Heisman
Jan 1, 2010
37,452
58,915
113
Why are so many of you assuming that if it doesn’t get done it’s RU’s fault. He may not want RU as much as you “GS is God” folks want him. He just might change his mind and say thanks but no thanks. It takes two sides to make it a yes but either one can make it a no go.
I'm starting to waiver on this. I've always wanted Greg but his demands are out of touch. A new football only complex to replace the Hale center and new indoor field house attached is a bit much. Originally it was reported, "he's not asking for anything any other coach wouldn't ask for". I have a hard time believing any coach is going to ask for a $200 mil. commitment from the school.

The Hale Center will be football only once the Rodkin is complete, has a new locker and weight room. I could see asking for more renovations or an addition plus the indoor facility. But an entire new complex that's just La La land. Somethings just not adding up.
 

RUScrew85

Heisman
Nov 7, 2003
30,054
16,939
0
I'm starting to waiver on this. I've always wanted Greg but his demands are out of touch. A new football only facility to replace the Hale center and new indoor field house attached is a bit much. Originally it was reported, "he's not asking for anything any other coach wouldn't ask for". I have a hard time believing any coach is going to ask for a $200 mil. commitment from the school.

The Hale Center will be football only once the Rodkin is complete, has a new locker and weight room. I could see asking for more renovations or an addition plus the indoor facility. But an entire new complex that's just La La land.

Hopefully for the GS fans it's a negotiating position.

Build the FH on the tennis courts or in the Hale parking lot. if they MUST be connected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MJL_52 and koleszar

King of S

All-Conference
Sep 20, 2017
3,436
2,808
113
I'm starting to waiver on this. I've always wanted Greg but his demands are out of touch. A new football only complex to replace the Hale center and new indoor field house attached is a bit much. Originally it was reported, "he's not asking for anything any other coach wouldn't ask for". I have a hard time believing any coach is going to ask for a $200 mil. commitment from the school.

The Hale Center will be football only once the Rodkin is complete, has a new locker and weight room. I could see asking for more renovations or an addition plus the indoor facility. But an entire new complex that's just La La land. Somethings just not adding up.
Agree- didn’t they just put in new locker room and weight room? Over the top demands.
 
Jun 7, 2001
36,192
43,526
113
I'm starting to waiver on this. I've always wanted Greg but his demands are out of touch. A new football only complex to replace the Hale center and new indoor field house attached is a bit much. Originally it was reported, "he's not asking for anything any other coach wouldn't ask for". I have a hard time believing any coach is going to ask for a $200 mil. commitment from the school.

The Hale Center will be football only once the Rodkin is complete, has a new locker and weight room. I could see asking for more renovations or an addition plus the indoor facility. But an entire new complex that's just La La land. Somethings just not adding up.

New facilities are needed to adequately compete in recruiting.

Northwestern, Purdue, Minnesota, Illinois, Indiana, Nebraska, and Maryland either have built or are building brand new facilities which blow Hale Center out of the water. Ohio State and Michigan already have the best facilities money can buy. Penn State is spending an additional $70 M to upgrade their facilities.

Sure, there are coaches who will be happy to take our money without asking for additional infrastructure. Who doesn’t want to make millions. But they wouldn’t be able to adequately recruit. New facilities are absolutely needed if we are to realize our Rose Bowl aspirations. Otherwise we will have to content ourselves with Big Ten bottom feeder status.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IL Lusciato

RURM85

All-Conference
Dec 1, 2012
7,544
3,027
0
I don’t think his demands are over the top. Schiano wants what everybody else in the Conference has, competitive football facilities. We’ve seen beautiful new projects completed in the last few years from Purdue to Minnesota to Illinois.
If this becomes a fundraising activity lasting years, other schools will continue negatively recruiting Rutgers, pointing out the lack of commitment to football.
If not Schiano, who else as Coach? Some MAC dude or maybe try lighting in a bottle again by hiring another first time coach. This shrinking fan base is already teetering on falling apart. Time to play serious or consider getting out.
 

RobotHunter

All-Conference
May 8, 2015
2,705
4,191
81
i am sure that some are rooting it does not happen
I posted this in another thread but anyone who wants the Schiano deal to fall through needs their head examined. They hire him it means we have a proven, respected, experienced head coach AND tons of facilities upgrades including an indoor field house to put us on par with our peer schools. Schiano walks away and we are left with crappy facilities and some no name coach coming in here, more dropped season tickets and zero buzz for years to come. This program will fall into a crater so deep it will never come back out. Easy decision here.
 

Letitrip

All-Conference
Sep 4, 2007
2,389
4,226
66
Greg needs to come but with realistic demands. There is a middle ground to be found.
And how do you know the demands are not realistic? Please stop making allegations that you have no ideal are true. Fact is Hobb and Co have let this go on for weeks and have basically no alternatives at this point. If this falls through hobbs should be sent back to South Orange asap. I don't think it will fall through - but the burden is on Hobbs to finish what he started. He meet with Schiano and knows full well what the demands were.
 
Last edited:

Knight177lb

All-Conference
Sep 2, 2014
1,349
1,318
113
I posted this in another thread but anyone who wants the Schiano deal to fall through needs their head examined. They hire him it means we have a proven, respected, experienced head coach AND tons of facilities upgrades including an indoor field house to put us on par with our peer schools. Schiano walks away and we are left with crappy facilities and some no name coach coming in here, more dropped season tickets and zero buzz for years to come. This program will fall into a crater so deep it will never come back out. Easy decision here.

This is so true. At this point, no matter how much we spend, it's going to be better decision to get Schiano than anybody else. If we don't get Schiano, attendance will plummet even further. We'd be lucky to make the NCAA minimum.
 

newell138

Heisman
Aug 1, 2001
37,187
48,011
112
I'm starting to waiver on this. I've always wanted Greg but his demands are out of touch. A new football only complex to replace the Hale center and new indoor field house attached is a bit much. Originally it was reported, "he's not asking for anything any other coach wouldn't ask for". I have a hard time believing any coach is going to ask for a $200 mil. commitment from the school.

The Hale Center will be football only once the Rodkin is complete, has a new locker and weight room. I could see asking for more renovations or an addition plus the indoor facility. But an entire new complex that's just La La land. Somethings just not adding up.

How is a football only complex too much? Do you realize there are some high schools that have better indoor practice facilities than our bubble? Its not too much to ask to have facilities that are comparable with the rest of the teams we are playing and competing in recruiting against. Its an investment that will pay for itself in the long term
 

Hardslider33

All-American
Nov 30, 2015
4,308
5,361
113
New facilities are needed to adequately compete in recruiting.

Northwestern, Purdue, Minnesota, Illinois, Indiana, Nebraska, and Maryland either have built or are building brand new facilities which blow Hale Center out of the water. Ohio State and Michigan already have the best facilities money can buy. Penn State is spending an additional $70 M to upgrade their facilities.

Sure, there are coaches who will be happy to take our money without asking for additional infrastructure. Who doesn’t want to make millions. But they wouldn’t be able to adequately recruit. New facilities are absolutely needed if we are to realize our Rose Bowl aspirations. Otherwise we will have to content ourselves with Big Ten bottom feeder status.

Rose Bowl?? Come on Al, while I can appreciate your love of Rutgers.
But we will never see that day.
Schiano is not God, and some are way over blowing this.
I see limited returns 8-4 is high water mark. We shall see, but even you was saying Greg needs to only get us back to competitive.
 
Jun 7, 2001
36,192
43,526
113
Rose Bowl?? Come on Al, while I can appreciate your love of Rutgers.
But we will never see that day.
Schiano is not God, and some are way over blowing this.
I see limited returns 8-4 is high water mark. We shall see, but even you was saying Greg needs to only get us back to competitive.

suit yourself. We throw up a great football facility, and we’re going to the Rose Bowl. You can stay home.
Priority #1 is competitiveness. But other possibilities will open up too.