Caleb and Cody Martin

RUJMM78

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
26,250
12,529
113
Pikiell would get serious consideration for Big 10 coach of the year honors in RU finished above 500
I think the focus should be on the number of league wins versus just a .500 record which can be padded with a easy out of conference record.I would like to see Rutgers win at least 5 B1G games which would be a sign of progress.
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
249,143
178,512
113
The backcourt (if Johnson is what they say) will easily be top10....maybe even top 5...

Johnson hasnt played a minute I wouldnt project anything...we only have his time at KSU which was spotty.

and even if the backcourt may be in the top half of the league, when every other position plus bench is better at the other schools then you realize, we have the least talented team in the league
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
Where i, and BAC, could be wrong is if players buy in to solid strength and conditioning and a strong commitment to improvement in the off season. If Sanders and Johnson come in to camp in super shape and are + defenders AND Sanders has an improved outside shot we may be wrong.
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
Freeman was also missing and he was putting up similar numbers to what Kadeem Jack did.

Freeman hasn't scored a point in the B1G. He is undersized. In the small sample of minutes he played he wasn't a good rebounder. he was a poor defender

Kadeem Jack or rashod kent comparisons need to stop. i think it is possible that Freeman can be a more valuable player than a Jack, at least as a senior.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac

Local Shill

All-American
Aug 30, 2001
21,524
7,329
113
because teams need to gel....this program needs to learn to win, its has lost 40 of its last 47 games...it does not know how to win, it has lost like 32 of 33 league games. Its going to be a process moving from where they were under Jordan to get better and learning how to compete under Pikiell...also you act like every other team does not improve. Pikiell will give the program a fighters chance, he puts us back in the game again competitive wise from the mess under Jordan, he isnt going to be a miracle worker with wins with a program that is the least talented in league

Exactly. We have some fans who operate in a vacuum. The other 13 teams are also holding offseason workouts, too. We have to improve more than they improve to move out of the basement. I'm confident we'll cut down on the number of asskickings we receive, hopefully eliminate OOC losses to low major and win maybe 4 conference games.
 

seels2662

Heisman
Aug 16, 2005
24,607
17,238
113
Johnson hasnt played a minute I wouldnt project anything...we only have his time at KSU which was spotty.

and even if the backcourt may be in the top half of the league, when every other position plus bench is better at the other schools then you realize, we have the least talented team in the league
The bench is a problem I admit that . But there are probably going to be 4-5 teams minimum whos starting 5 will be equal to or worse than ours.
 

RU-Choppin-Ohio

Heisman
Jul 31, 2011
33,013
37,858
113
because teams need to gel....this program needs to learn to win, its has lost 40 of its last 47 games...it does not know how to win, it has lost like 32 of 33 league games. Its going to be a process moving from where they were under Jordan to get better and learning how to compete under Pikiell...also you act like every other team does not improve. Pikiell will give the program a fighters chance, he puts us back in the game again competitive wise from the mess under Jordan, he isnt going to be a miracle worker with wins with a program that is the least talented in league

Teams need time to Gel......[banana]
 

Scarlet Shack

Heisman
Feb 3, 2004
26,302
16,028
73
Here is the reality...

We have NO idea on what we have

If we get Thiam and the twins...We have a bunch of 3 and 4 star recruits that have all SHOWN flashes of really good potential....but we don't know what they have

A good coach really could put this team together and make a run with it. Now, what's a run? Maybe .500 this year (more than that is a lot, team has to learn to win close games even if it is competitive)...and a NIT/NCAA bubble in the second year.

But that requires
-a total buy in to the new staff
-team commitment to S&C
-team commitment to working hard in this off season
-buying into the team concept. Guys who got lots of minutes in necessity need to adjust to lesser minutes and possible being passed on the depth chart...means accepting their roles

Steve P has some raw athleticism nad basketball talent to work with. This will test quickly what kind of coach he is and can be...
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
While thrown in with the strength in conditioning current players will need to be reprogrammed or programmed with playing with the effort and intensity and smarts that is required to win against good teams.
 

MadRU

Heisman
Jul 26, 2001
38,435
19,592
98
Here is the reality...

We have NO idea on what we have

If we get Thiam and the twins...We have a bunch of 3 and 4 star recruits that have all SHOWN flashes of really good potential....but we don't know what they have

A good coach really could put this team together and make a run with it. Now, what's a run? Maybe .500 this year (more than that is a lot, team has to learn to win close games even if it is competitive)...and a NIT/NCAA bubble in the second year.

But that requires
-a total buy in to the new staff
-team commitment to S&C
-team commitment to working hard in this off season
-buying into the team concept. Guys who got lots of minutes in necessity need to adjust to lesser minutes and possible being passed on the depth chart...means accepting their roles

Steve P has some raw athleticism nad basketball talent to work with. This will test quickly what kind of coach he is and can be...

You do realize the twins would have to sit out this season.
 

RU-Choppin-Ohio

Heisman
Jul 31, 2011
33,013
37,858
113
Where i, and BAC, could be wrong is if players buy in to solid strength and conditioning and a strong commitment to improvement in the off season. If Sanders and Johnson come in to camp in super shape and are + defenders AND Sanders has an improved outside shot we may be wrong.

Where I, and BAC Could be wrong.....:rolleyes:
 

seels2662

Heisman
Aug 16, 2005
24,607
17,238
113
Name more than 1
Just look at the bottom of the standings and pick them. Minnesota and Illinois were trainwrecks at the end of the season just like us. Penn State and Nebraska each lose their best player off of mighty 7-11 and 6-12 campaigns.
 

RU-Choppin-Ohio

Heisman
Jul 31, 2011
33,013
37,858
113
I wonder how many people know the best returning players on each team or what teams lost players to transfers/graduation.

I know OSU lost about 4 players. I think Purdue's center is gone. Iowa's best shooter Ulhtoff (sp) is gone. Yogi's gone.

Without looking it up, name the top returning centers in the B1G ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

RickB113

All-Conference
Nov 4, 2005
2,271
1,383
0
because teams need to gel....this program needs to learn to win, its has lost 40 of its last 47 games...it does not know how to win, it has lost like 32 of 33 league games. Its going to be a process moving from where they were under Jordan to weget better and learning how to compete under Pikiell...also you act like every other team does not improve. Pikiell will give the program a fighters chance, he puts us back in the game again competitive wise from the mess under Jordan, he isnt going to be a miracle worker with wins with a program that is the least talented in league
We have a lot of the same pieces back and Johnson played with us last year so it shouldn't take long to "gell". Although I do agree teams need to learn to play together. I just don't think a team that returns as many players as we do should need as long, but you have a fair point. Learning how to win isn't a real thing. What has happened in previous years doesn't matter. This is a new team with a new coach and a new identity. Just like when the team recruited guys like Mack and Rosario from St. Anthony's and people said well they "know how to win". How did that work out? Winning is talent + good coaching. There is enough talent on this team to win 14 games.
 

MADHAT1

Heisman
Apr 1, 2003
31,592
16,399
113
Expecting constant NCAA appearances after the third year of Pikiell is truly wishful thinking.It would take top twenty recruiting classes the next 3 years to put Rutgers anywhere near getting a NCAA bid .
Meant that after his third year RU fans will be thinking Pikiell is the coach that will be bringing RU to the tourney on a constant bases.
I said: "Year 3 of the Pikiell is when I expect the RU MBB program to start showing it can win on a regular bases and the 4th year start doing that."
But should have explained that I expected the NCAA appearances to start in his fifth year.
You can say I expect a winning season in his 4th year and year 3 will start showing Rutgers is headed in the right direction and will be a season that is close to being above.500
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
249,143
178,512
113
Just look at the bottom of the standings and pick them. Minnesota and Illinois were trainwrecks at the end of the season just like us. Penn State and Nebraska each lose their best player off of mighty 7-11 and 6-12 campaigns.


Minnesota has all those suspended players back plus a top class coming in. Ilinois was decimated as hard as RU by injuries and those players will be back and they have perhaps the best player in the conference returning. Penn State has the top recruiting class in the Big 10 coming in with 3 Philly players. Nebby blew RU out by huge margins so that gap is pretty large there
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
249,143
178,512
113
We have a lot of the same pieces back and Johnson played with us last year so it shouldn't take long to "gell". Although I do agree teams need to learn to play together. I just don't think a team that returns as many players as we do should need as long, but you have a fair point. Learning how to win isn't a real thing. What has happened in previous years doesn't matter. This is a new team with a new coach and a new identity. Just like when the team recruited guys like Mack and Rosario from St. Anthony's and people said well they "know how to win". How did that work out? Winning is talent + good coaching. There is enough talent on this team to win 14 games.


sure but the opponents are more talented...just because RU might be playing better does not mean that they are better than the rest of the Big 10 talent...on a neutral court, RU has the least talent..that does not mean that every matchup goes to the most talented but RU has a long way to go to cut the gap
 

RUJMM78

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
26,250
12,529
113
really? what is this based on...not reality
After 25 years of futility, there are still some fans that continue to say Rutgers has talent compared to league competition.The won/loss record continues to say no to that conclusion.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ScarletRunner

Scarlet Shack

Heisman
Feb 3, 2004
26,302
16,028
73
I think seels may be jumping the gun a bit....but I see his point

I saw glimpses of and stretches of things from Sanders, Laurent, and Williams to know they are pieces that, if coached right, toward building a mid level competitive big ten level players. Think Freeman can join that group, but did not see quite enough of him to say that.

Need to see them step up...and show development and consistency. Coaching can help that a lot

Conversely, it might be more than one year to get them going....

And we need big man development and Johnson to develop and show quickly

This is why I say we have a bunch of three and a few four star talent that is underdeveloped...and if the development catches on ....we could progress faster

It's really unknown
 

RUinFla

All-Conference
Aug 2, 2001
15,934
3,640
0
Cannot remember where I saw it,but it was an article rating the newcomers for each BTN school. We were third from last--but only because the two teams below us had only one newcomer. The average for our three newcomers was about 79; the two schools "below" us both had the one recruit, and they both were over 90. Of the schools listed above us, the lowest recruit average was 87, compared to our 79. Going to be a process. Who among you very occasional posters is going to be the first to want to fire the staff next March, in favor of your newest flavor of the month? Seen this movie before. Exaggerated opinion of our players, and if the team doesn't play up to what you think those players should accomplish, fire the coach Kind of thinking that brought us the spectacularly awful FHJ.
TL
 

bowlgoal

Heisman
Jul 20, 2004
12,312
11,587
93
Just show me progress and the ability to recruit. We have sanders for one more year so enjoy it. He's a very solid player and I think he really blows it out this year And shows how he makes everyone else better. But the future of this program has to be based on 4 year players who can grow and mature. I think we could could have a 12-13 win season and if a few things go our way, maybe a few more wins. We can't focus on the record just yet and I'm finally excited on this rebuilding process. The coach is solid but the assistants really make this program better than its been in 20 years plus,
 

Knights 1212

All-American
Sep 9, 2003
27,560
8,500
113
The twins are supposedly visiting Nevada this weekend. the original list had California, RU, DePaul, Providence, Old Dominion and Providence. Shortly after East Carolina was added and I guess Nevada was also added. I know visits were made to East Carolina, RU and now Nevada. I think California was cancelled. I think this might go on for a while. I just hope that the Thiam situation will be finalized soon. As of now we still only have 9 scholarship players.
 

RUsince52

All-Conference
Apr 3, 2016
6,821
2,046
0
None can ensure ultimate success at Rutgers based on recent history.Risks mist be taken because another 5 years of mediocre success will put Pikiell in a similar position to recent head coaches who have failed.To his credit Pikiell has stated that Rutgers must win quickly to change the perception of the program and enhance recruiting.
I'm sure the staff has it figured out as far as what really needs to be done and what are the alternatives. I think a few extra wins are a must because the type of recruits we need are only going to accept improvement to a point. Your not fixing the program as much as changing the concept and playing philosophy. It will be interesting and hopefully a little quicker then must fans think. I'd be happy if we can figure out how to not go 4-5 without scoring against anyone we play.
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
The twins are supposedly visiting Nevada this weekend. the original list had California, RU, DePaul, Providence, Old Dominion and Providence. Shortly after East Carolina was added and I guess Nevada was also added. I know visits were made to East Carolina, RU and now Nevada. I think California was cancelled. I think this might go on for a while. I just hope that the Thiam situation will be finalized soon. As of now we still only have 9 scholarship players.

They just added Nevada to go party in Vegas celebrating their Rutgers decision