Mueller investigation was the biggest Democrat farce in history.

EEResistable

All-American
May 29, 2001
89,617
6,203
61
That's really saying something. There have been so many. But I still the biggest is electing a Kenyan.
 
Last edited:

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
Seriously though, it was an investigation accepted and even encouraged by Republican lawmakers. Mueller was appointed (a Republican) and he obviously conducted the investigation thoroughly and with integrity. We needed to know if the Russian infiltration was at all used, encouraged, or aided by the campaign it sought to help put into power.

Can’t blame the Democrats. Blame the Russians. And if your pissed about it lasting so long, blame Trump for hiring criminals with ties to foreign governments, and Flynn, Manifort, Gates, and Papa D for lying to investigators.

Dossier and social media influence aside, Russians hacked political candidates for President and dumped the information into the media to affect the election. That act alone warrants a full investigation, esp when it benefits the winner, which it did no doubt.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,251
3,328
113
We needed to know if the Russian infiltration was at all used, encouraged, or aided by the campaign it sought to help put into power
No sir, what we needed was proof or evidence of the allegation before we needed to “know ....”. There never was anything that spawned this other than a corrupt party and the sycophantic followers inability to accept that their vision was cast aside by the will of the of the people.

Evidence, next time start there.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,251
3,328
113
Dossier and social media influence aside, Russians hacked political candidates for President and dumped the information into the media to affect the election. That act alone warrants a full investigation, esp when it benefits the winner, which it did no doubt.
We don’t know that.

The DNC never turned over their server and neither did Hillary.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
No sir, what we needed was proof or evidence of the allegation before we needed to “know ....”. There never was anything that spawned this other than a corrupt party and the sycophantic followers inability to accept that their vision was cast aside by the will of the of the people.

Evidence, next time start there.
There was clear evidence of Russian influence and infiltration. Collusion was investigated. There only has to be a crime committed for someone to be investigated for it Johnny Jumponit, when there is evidence of someone committing a crime, that person is usually arrested.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,251
3,328
113
There was clear evidence of Russian influence and infiltration. Collusion was investigated. There only has to be a crime committed for someone to be investigated for it Johnny Jumponit, when there is evidence of someone committing a crime, that person is usually arrested.
In the election, sure. Had nothing to do without Trump. That was all Dem and IC concocted ********.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
No no sir. You’re conflating issues.
Not at all. I said that the Russian government infiltrated and effected the election (that alone occurred through the hacking of the DNC) and that action alone influenced the election (however slight you think). Investigating what happened, why, and who were involved was critical. Trump, being the campaigned that benefited, needed to be cleared of involvement. He was. There’s no conflation, it’s pretty simple. Just because something makes you cranky, doesn’t make it wrong. Trump’s rights weren’t violated.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
In the election, sure. Had nothing to do without Trump. That was all Dem and IC concocted ********.
But that’s were you are wrong.....it had everything to do with Trump. He was the winning campaign, and the campaign for which the Russian efforts were clearly aimed to benefit. The Mueller report cleared the campaign of wrongdoing, rejoice proud Trumpian for the system worked to deny your opponents of that ammo. No Dem should be talking about Trump/Russia and a illegitimate presidency again.....they will of course, and they should be laughed out of the room.....I just hope it isn’t all of the morons.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,602
821
113
FFS! So now we're back to deep state?
Since you have proven time and time again to be entirely too dumb to understand what is going on perhaps it is time for you to shut your mouth, sit back and see what happens. The kiddie table exists so the imbeciles have a place while the adults converse.
 

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,091
694
0
We're going to find this hoax was started by 0bama & Hilliary...

They will be held accountable...

GITMOtour2019!
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,602
821
113
That has not been proven. That is all based on an assessment done by Crowdstrike. Stop it.
It is odd that the claim is that Russia hacked the DNC server and gave the information to wikileaks. Wikileaks claims the information did not come from Russia. Wikileaks claims nobody from Mueller team ever contacted them. Will be ibtereating to see where that claim is confirmed.
 

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
It is odd that the claim is that Russia hacked the DNC server and gave the information to wikileaks. Wikileaks claims the information did not come from Russia. Wikileaks claims nobody from Mueller team ever contacted them. Will be ibtereating to see where that claim is confirmed.

I've asked from day 1, some of the evidence of the hacks. IMHO it's important that all agencies, businesses, etc. know the methods by which their systems were compromised.

Spoke with an IT Security Professional a couple weeks back. He's a former Seal who transitioned into IT security after retiring, and consults with business and governments on IT security, and he admits that for the most part people just are educated enough on proper protocols and procedures, but he did say that without a doubt the US is actively combating foreign states in the cyber world.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
That has not been proven. That is all based on an assessment done by Crowdstrike. Stop it.
Barr’s summary of the Mueller Report stated that Russia hacked the DNC and shared to Wikileaks.....if just that alone, it’s proven. But am I supposed to deny the summary now? Maybe there is conflicting information in the actual report? Should I now assume Trump might still be guilty of collusion? Are you telling me there’s a chance?
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
It is odd that the claim is that Russia hacked the DNC server and gave the information to wikileaks. Wikileaks claims the information did not come from Russia. Wikileaks claims nobody from Mueller team ever contacted them. Will be ibtereating to see where that claim is confirmed.
So there is a chance then! We can’t accept the summary of the Mueller Report? That’s awesome! Collusion is alive! The unicorns ride tonight! Powered by the newfound energy and hope of Trump collusion.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,251
3,328
113
I've asked from day 1, some of the evidence of the hacks. IMHO it's important that all agencies, businesses, etc. know the methods by which their systems were compromised.

Spoke with an IT Security Professional a couple weeks back. He's a former Seal who transitioned into IT security after retiring, and consults with business and governments on IT security, and he admits that for the most part people just are educated enough on proper protocols and procedures, but he did say that without a doubt the US is actively combating foreign states in the cyber world.
100%, as are US Corporations. China is the biggest offender followed by Iran, NK, Russia, the UK, the EU, etc.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,251
3,328
113
Barr’s summary of the Mueller Report stated that Russia hacked the DNC and shared to Wikileaks.....if just that alone, it’s proven. But am I supposed to deny the summary now? Maybe there is conflicting information in the actual report? Should I now assume Trump might still be guilty of collusion? Are you telling me there’s a chance?
I’m telling you that it’s based on a DNC funded organization, Crowdstrike, who supplied the information assessment to the IC. The IC never did their own assessment as they were never given access to the servers to run their own Investigational Analysis. Based on the information the IC received, and it’s the only information they have to go off of, it appears the hack was by Russia.

I’m not saying it wasn’t Russia, it most likely was. I’m merely saying the DNC funded the analysis, funded the Dossier, started the collusion narrative, and trumpeted the lie through targeted leaks to the MSM, who then doubled down on the narrative and spun a web of ******** and lies for 2 years.

There is a hell of a lot more smoke to the DNC than there ever was of Trump. You all just bought the Trump narrative because of your hatred of him. You all were useful idiots as proven by Mueller.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
I’m telling you that it’s based on a DNC funded organization, Crowdstrike, who supplied the information assessment to the IC. The IC never did their own assessment as they were never given access to the servers to run their own Investigational Analysis. Based on the information the IC received, and it’s the only information they have to go off of, it appears the hack was by Russia.

I’m not saying it wasn’t Russia, it most likely was. I’m merely saying the DNC funded the analysis, funded the Dossier, started the collusion narrative, and trumpeted the lie through targeted leaks to the MSM, who then doubled down on the narrative and spun a web of ******** and lies for 2 years.

There is a hell of a lot more smoke to the DNC than there ever was of Trump. You all just bought the Trump narrative because of your hatred of him. You all were useful idiots as proven by Mueller.
I do hate the chubby mouth bastard, and I am an idiot on most things, but the same summary that has you mouthing off like a sixteen year old girl elected prom queen tells me Russia hacked the DNC......either I believe it or I don’t believe any of it.....I’m not going to selectively believe only what fits the narrative I want.

I wanted an investigation, I got it, I accept the results. We can’t all be as infallible as you Dog. We can only bask in your glory.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,251
3,328
113
I do hate the chubby mouth bastard, and I am an idiot on most things, but the same summary that has you mouthing off like a sixteen year old girl elected prom queen tells me Russia hacked the DNC......either I believe it or I don’t believe any of it.....I’m not going to selectively believe only what fits the narrative I want.

I wanted an investigation, I got it, I accept the results. We can’t all be as infallible as you Dog. We can only bask in your glory.
I never took you for a surface level consumer of information.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,251
3,328
113
When I can’t see below the surface of the water, all I can do is trust the guy that just surfaced. That’s not the news, so stuff that ****.
When you don’t “want” to see below the surface. The below surface information is out there. Most of it has been posted here and dismissed by you all.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
I’m telling you that it’s based on a DNC funded organization, Crowdstrike, who supplied the information assessment to the IC. The IC never did their own assessment as they were never given access to the servers to run their own Investigational Analysis. Based on the information the IC received, and it’s the only information they have to go off of, it appears the hack was by Russia.

I’m not saying it wasn’t Russia, it most likely was. I’m merely saying the DNC funded the analysis, funded the Dossier, started the collusion narrative, and trumpeted the lie through targeted leaks to the MSM, who then doubled down on the narrative and spun a web of ******** and lies for 2 years.

There is a hell of a lot more smoke to the DNC than there ever was of Trump. You all just bought the Trump narrative because of your hatred of him. You all were useful idiots as proven by Mueller.

trump is such an honest man. I'm sure you're right.

FFS do you actually believe the ******** you type?
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,251
3,328
113
trump is such an honest man. I'm sure you're right.

FFS do you actually believe the ******** you type?
I’m not saying he’s honest. I’m not saying he’s good. I’m not saying he isn’t a unconvicted criminal.

I’m saying with 100% certainty, he didn’t collude with Russia as vwas completely and totally exhonerated by SC Mueller.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
I’m not saying he’s honest. I’m not saying he’s good. I’m not saying he isn’t a unconvicted criminal.

I’m saying with 100% certainty, he didn’t collude with Russia as vwas completely and totally exhonerated by SC Mueller.

Except he wasn't completely exonerated by Mueller, not even by Barr's letter. You really do believe every stupid piece of ******** trump says.