So the FBI says the “memo” is factual.
- Thread starter EEResistable
- Start date
One: we still have no idea what the memo says, right?
Two: why do you guys hate unnamed sources from every other outlet BUT fox?
Three: a document can have no factual inaccuracies, yet still distort the reality of a situation by leaving facts out
- Nunes pretty much told us what it is going to contain(below)
- Motives, it's all about motives
- I don't deny that. I do want to see the Schiff memo, but I would bet he withdraws it.
Link
Keep setting the stage to blow off facts. Bottom line is you just dont want the memo to be true so you will figure out a way to excuse your desired belief. Typical liberal thinking.
lol...
all these House Dems & Dem Senators saying "the release of this memo is a bad idea"
"unpresidented"...
"reckless"...
all these House Dems & Dem Senators saying "the release of this memo is a bad idea"
"unpresidented"...
"reckless"...
What I gather is that if Trump does nothing, it's declassified after 5 days. That would be Saturday. He can release it beforehand.
I truly don't think he will release it tonight. It will muddy his message.
Close.
Trump has 5 days to declassify it. It doesn’t automatically get declassified at the end of the 5 day period if he does nothing. Of course he can declassify it if he chooses before the 5 days are up.
Listen to this guy...he's an "expert" in this as most in the main News media are too!
Situational relativism. Lying with the Truth. Or quite frankly, 'Truth' as we know it only exists according to the circumstances of the moment if it exists at all which in most cases is strictly realtive to how one views what it actually is at any given moment don't you know?
CountryWrong again. You really shouldn't try to correct me. Stay in your lane.
Link
"If the measure passes the House committee vote, President Donald Trump would have five days to block the release of the document. If after five days there is no White House action, the information would be released publicly. "
If you’re referring to me not wanting the memo to be true, absolutely. I absolutely do not want this memo to be true. That our FBI was manipulated and used by politicians to gain control over a d-bag running for the GOP makes me sick. That the integrity of the FBI will forever be questioned makes me sick. That an appointed SP charged with a critical investigation gets his perception of impartiality shredded, due to such underhanded and pitiful tactics makes me sick.
Literally nauseous.
I don’t want this memo to be true. Not because I can’t stand Trump or the “winning” bully, punch sensitive people in the gut, **** other men’s wives, money cures everything, my wife is hotter than yours, can’t see anything for my ego bs he pukes up each time he speaks.
I don’t want it to be true, because I will probably never trust government again. I want to believe that people want to do what’s right, even if it means losing.....losing an election, losing control, losing money, whatever.
But that doesn’t mean I won’t believe it if I see the evidence. I might be a ***** idealist, but I’m not frightened of facing reality.
Wrong motivation. Keep digging. They were altering the Clinton email summary to get her off before Trump won the general.
This is you placing false hope or expectations into folks who by default cannot or will not do what you hope especially once given power and motive to do the exact opposite.
Government by itself can't be good or bad. It is the morality of those in it which determines what it will be. After the memo is released you will (should) be convinced as many of us are NEVER to trust those running Government and particularly with no moral limits.
I don’t know about that. And I’m really wondering why Trump didn’t instruct Sessions to tie that all up his first day in the oval. “Lock her up” was one of his big hits on tour. And I think Comey hurt her by the way he handled it during the home stretch.
But, again, if true I’d support going after Clinton, Comey and everyone else fast and hard. Why hasn’t Trump instructed Sessions to get it dealt with then? There was an investigation in the House.
It's hard to conduct an investigation when your investigators are destroying the evidence, not recording interviews, and letting everyone off the hook.