****** 2-25-2022 NCAA TOURNEY THREAD*********

Ugoff

Heisman
May 7, 2009
16,403
21,489
0
They really need to clarify that running out of bounds without the ball rule. Different refs interpret it differently. The “you can’t be the first to touch it” is in reference to if you’re coming back in to get a rebound or loose ball. But if someone is driving at the top of the key and you run back in bounds and establish yourself w both feet before they release the ball to pass...then you weren’t the first person to touch it since coming back in bounds as your teammate was still touching it
Agree, Murray was called for this in the opening minutes of a UT game several years ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EliteBlue

Lempface

Heisman
Feb 16, 2009
12,159
20,638
98
purdue finally figured it out. but you have to do it every time until they double.
Yeah I've been scratching my head, if I was coach you're coming out if you don't pass the ball to the post every. Single. Possession.
 

ck-2

Heisman
Apr 7, 2007
11,306
19,154
113
St Peters gets by with a lot of reaching, bumping, slapping, etc. A lot like a Pitino coached team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jrm693
May 27, 2007
31,941
25,080
113
The one I hate is close game.

“now you don’t need a 3 here”

1) because it’s said like every freaking time
2) because like 90% of the time it’s said u do in fact need a 3 lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: ManitouDan

track42

Heisman
Feb 18, 2017
6,597
15,047
0
Purdue needs to pull this out because they have a better chance to beat the North Carolina/Ucla winner.
 

hotelblue

Heisman
Jul 6, 2006
41,683
13,121
0
Yeah I've been scratching my head, if I was coach you're coming out if you don't pass the ball to the post every. Single. Possession.
no threes unless it’s a nice kick out or a swing after the kick, then those would be good set shots. even then just post him again on the weak side block.
 

bbnkat02

Heisman
Nov 14, 2017
47,700
71,064
113
The one I hate is close game.

“now you don’t need a 3 here”

1) because it’s said like every freaking time
2) because like 90% of the time it’s said u do in fact need a 3 lol
Like down 6 with 30 seconds.

“You don’t need a three here”.

Bull. At that point if you don’t take it you’re leaving it at the other team’s line and picking how much you want to lose by.
 

hotelblue

Heisman
Jul 6, 2006
41,683
13,121
0
The one I hate is close game.

“now you don’t need a 3 here”

1) because it’s said like every freaking time
2) because like 90% of the time it’s said u do in fact need a 3 lol
in 1994 they would say it when there’s like 30-40 seconds left. a few years ago i heard it said with 7 seconds left. down 4 of course. they take a second off each year lol
 

ManitouDan_anon

Heisman
Dec 7, 2006
20,073
32,434
0
I cant decide who I dislike / disrespect more , The B!G T!N or St Dick . It hurts but I guess Purdue , If St Dick gets UNC , UNC will beat them by 40
 

ck-2

Heisman
Apr 7, 2007
11,306
19,154
113
Guys like Edey are frustrating to watch. Have all the size in the world and are awkward as can be.
 

rick64

Heisman
Jan 25, 2007
24,965
34,693
113
Providence 24% FGA. Gift wrapping an E8 for the Cheathawks and Rughead. 🤬
 

jbne222

Heisman
Dec 14, 2019
5,561
10,515
113
I feel so much worse after watching these games. Yes St. Peter’s is better than I thought and it’s somewhat nice to see other teams struggle/lose to them, but the loss is still inexcusable and seeing how bad teams like Kansas and Purdue look, we really had a chance this year and blew it.
 

hotelblue

Heisman
Jul 6, 2006
41,683
13,121
0
purdue is doing the right thing but a pete 3 every other possession will negate that. dang